UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-K

(Mark One)

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017

For the transition period from _______ to _______

Commission file number 000-25097

ORBITAL TRACKING CORP.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (305) 560-5355

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock, par value $0.0001

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes [  ] No [X]

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes [  ] No [X]

Indicate by check whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [  ]

Indicate by check whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such filed). Yes [X] No [  ]

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [  ] No [X]

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of the last business day of the registrants most recently completed first fiscal quarter, based on the price at which the common equity was last sold on the OTC Bulletin Board on such date was approximately $3,015,704. For purposes of this computation only, all officers, directors and 10% or greater stockholders of the registrant are deemed to be affiliates.

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock as of the latest practicable date.

ORBITAL TRACKING CORP.

ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K

Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2017

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I

Item 1. Business

Corporate History

On January 22, 2015, the Company changed its name to “Orbital Tracking Corp.” from “Great West Resources, Inc.” pursuant to a merger with a newly formed wholly owned subsidiary.

On March 28, 2014, the Company merged with a newly-formed wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company solely for the purpose of changing its state of incorporation to Nevada from Delaware, effecting a 1:150 reverse split of its common stock, and changing its name to Great West Resources, Inc. in connection with the plans to enter into the business of potash mining and exploration. During late 2014, the Company abandoned its efforts to enter the potash business.

The Company was originally incorporated in 1997 as a Florida corporation. On April 21, 2010, the Company merged with and into a newly-formed wholly-owned subsidiary for the purpose of changing its state of incorporation to Delaware, effecting a 2:1 forward split of its common stock, and changing its name to EClips Media Technologies, Inc. On April 25, 2011, the Company changed its name to “Silver Horn Mining Ltd.” pursuant to a merger with a newly-formed wholly-owned subsidiary.

Global Telesat Communications Limited (“GTCL”) was formed under the laws of England and Wales in 2008. On February 19, 2015, the Company entered into a share exchange agreement with GTCL and all of the holders of the outstanding equity of GTCL pursuant to which GTCL became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company.

For accounting purposes, this transaction was accounted for as a reverse acquisition and has been treated as a recapitalization of the Company with GTCL considered the accounting acquirer, and the financial statements of the accounting acquirer became the financial statements of the registrant. The completion of the Share Exchange resulted in a change of control. The Share Exchange was accounted for as a reverse acquisition and re-capitalization. The GTCL shareholders obtained approximately 39% of voting control on the date of Share Exchange. GTCL was the acquirer for financial reporting purposes and the Company was the acquired company. The consolidated financial statements after the acquisition include the balance sheets of both companies at historical cost, the historical results of GTCL and the results of the Company from the acquisition date. All share and per share information in the accompanying consolidated financial statements and footnotes has been retroactively restated to reflect the recapitalization.

On February 28, 2018, a majority of our shareholders gave their written consent approving a reverse split of our common stock at a ratio of 1 for 150. Effective March 8, 2018, our trading symbol will be changed to “TRKKD” for a period of twenty business days, after which it will revert to “TRKK.” As a result of the reverse split, our common stock will have the following new CUSIP number: 68558X209. All share and per share, information in the accompanying consolidated financial statements and footnotes has been retroactively restated to reflect the reverse split.

Our Current Business

The Company is a distributor, developer and reseller of satellite enabled communications hardware and provides products, airtime and related services to customers located both in the United States and internationally through its subsidiaries, US based Orbital Satcom Corp. (“Orbital Satcom”) and UK based GTCL. We sell equipment and airtime for use on all major satellite networks including Globalstar, Inmarsat, Iridium and Thuraya. We specialize in offering a range of satellite enabled personal and asset tracking products and provide an advanced mapping portal for customers using our range of GSM and satellite-based GPS tracking devices. Additionally, we operate a short-term rental service for customers who require use of our equipment for a limited time without the up-front expense of purchasing hardware.

Our acquisition of GTCL in February 2015 expanded our global satellite-based infrastructure and business, which was first launched in December 2014 through the purchase of certain contracts which entitle us to transmit GPS tracking coordinates and other information at preferential rates through one of the world’s largest commercial satellite networks.

We now have a physical presence in the U.K and Miami, as well as our online storefront presence in more than 10 countries and have in excess of 25,000 customers located in more than 125 countries across every continent in the world. Our customers include businesses, U.S. and foreign governments, non-governmental and charitable organizations, military users, resellers and private individuals located all over the world.

Through GTCL, we believe we are one of the leading providers in Europe of Mobile Satellite Solutions (MSS) including satellite trackers, satellite phones, mobile broadband Wi-Fi hotspots and terminals. By enabling wireless communications in areas not served or underserved by terrestrial wireless networks, or in circumstances where terrestrial networks are not operational due to natural or man-made disasters, we seek to meet our customers’ increasing desire for connectivity anywhere in the world.

Our MSS products rely on satellite networks for voice, data and tracking connectivity and thus are not reliant on cell towers or other local infrastructure. As a result, our MSS solutions are suitable for recreational travelers and adventurers, government and military users, and corporations and individuals wishing to communicate from remote locations, or in the event of an emergency such as a power outage, hurricane or other natural disaster during which regular cell phone, telephone and internet service may not be available. We purchase these products directly from the manufacturers or distribution partners and sell them directly to end users and a growing base of resellers that we have around the world.

Our principal focus is on growing our existing satellite-based hardware, airtime and related services, specifically services attracting recurring revenue for the Company. Additionally, we have been developing our own dual mode tracking device for use by retail, corporate and governmental customers worldwide, however its development has been slow due to lack of sufficient funding.

Satellite Communications Services

As a result of the purchase of contracts and assets from Global Telesat Corp. (“GTC”) in December 2014, we commenced providing satellite communications services globally via satellite over Globalstar’s satellite based simplex data network. We provide this service through our Orbital Satcom and GTC subsidiaries. Our rights under the purchased contracts allow us to have preferred pricing arrangements with Globalstar for each account used during the term of contracts. We then offer our customers a range of prepaid and monthly fee satellite communications airtime options.

The simplex service is a one-way burst data transmission from a commercial simplex device over the Globalstar network that can be used to track and monitor assets. We can use each simplex or one-way transmission account to transmit an unlimited number of locational or status messages from tracking devices used anywhere within the Globalstar simplex coverage area. At the heart of the simplex service is a demodulator and RF interface, called an applique, which is located at a Globalstar gateway. The gateways equipped with appliques, many of which are owned by us, provide coverage for simplex tracking devices over vast areas of the globe. The applique receives and collates messages from all simplex tracking devices transmitting over the Globalstar network. Simplex tracking devices consist of a telemetry unit, an application specific sensor, a battery and optional global positioning functionality. The small size of the devices makes them attractive for use in tracking asset shipments, monitoring unattended remote assets, trailer tracking and mobile security together with lone worker or recreational user safety.

Aside from providing services over Globalstar’s simplex data network, we are, through GTCL and Orbital Satcom, an authorized reseller of Globalstar’s two-way voice and data transmissions service, called the duplex service, and simplex and duplex satellite telecommunications services offered by other leading networks such as Iridium, Inmarsat and Thuraya. We offer a range of prepaid and monthly contract satellite communications airtime options from these network providers. We typically pay the network providers a monthly access fee per subscriber, as well as usage fees for airtime minutes used by our subscribers. This is a rapidly growing market and we believe we are well positioned to take advantage of this growth. Our customers are in industries such as maritime, aviation, government/military, emergency/humanitarian services, mining, forestry, oil and gas, heavy equipment, transportation and utilities as well as recreational users. We are focused on growing and diversifying our customer base, increasing our product range and making maximum use of our preferred pricing arrangements with Globalstar, which are long term contracts that currently generate approximately 5% of our annual revenue.

Online Storefronts

We operate two mobile friendly e-commerce websites through our Orbital Satcom and GTCL subsidiaries which offer a range of MSS products and solutions. These websites produce sales and attract enquiries from customers and potential customers from all around the world. Over the long term, we plan to develop additional country-specific websites or offer translation options on our existing websites to target customers in South America, Asia and Europe where we anticipate there will be substantial further demand for our products.

In addition to our two main e-commerce websites, we make portable satellite voice, data and tracking solutions easier to find and buy online through our various third-party e-commerce storefronts offered by Amazon, eBay and Walmart. We currently have storefronts in the UK, US, Germany, France, Spain, Italy, Mexico, Japan Canada and Australia. We have invested in personnel to translate our listings correctly in the different countries we are represented in and are regularly improving and increasing our listings on all Amazon sites. We currently have more than 2,000 separate product listings on all third-party sites and invest in inventory to hold at Amazon’s various warehouses around the world to ensure that orders are shipped and received by customers as quickly as possible. The products include handheld satellite phones, personal and asset tracking devices, portable high-speed broadband terminals, and satellite Wi-Fi hotspots.

Mapping and Tracking Portal

Our advanced mapping and tracking portals, www.orbitaltrack.com offered by Orbital Satcom, and www.gtctrack.com offered by GTCL, are available for use by registered customers who pay a monthly subscription to access them. OrbitalTrack and GTCTrack display real-time worldwide asset location reports including position, speed, altitude and heading and also provides past location and movement history reports on a wide range of tracking devices. These mapping portals are available to all of our customers to monitor their assets and we intend to aggressively pursue new customers for this application.

Proprietary Satellite Tracking Products

We are hoping to continue development of our first own brand global tracking product, a dual-mode asset tracker, of which we hope to make available in the marketplace in 2019, subject to sufficient capital raising and following final testing and receipt of necessary regulatory and compatibility certifications. The Company’s dual-mode asset tracker is designed to address the current technical and service cost challenges facing the global Asset Management Systems market. The first product designed and developed by the Company, the dual-mode tracker utilizes both cellular and satellite technology to provide truly global tracking, automatically switching between the cellular and satellite links making it an ideal solution for use in both populated and remote areas, including trans-oceanic routes. For commercial users in transportation, shipping, logistics, fleet management and construction, it features detailing reporting alerts, status and GPS location data allowing cargo and vehicles to be tracked nearly anywhere in the world while lowering operating costs by utilizing cellular when available and satellite in remote areas, optimizing roaming charges and delivering significant cost savings, by easily locating lost or stolen assets.

We anticipate that we will be able to finalize development and certification of the new dual-mode tracker for approximately $50,000 to $75,000 and believe there is strong customer demand based on existing customer requests.

We also intend to develop additional personal and asset tracking products suitable for government and recreational users. Users of these devices will be able to see the location and movements of their devices through our OrbitalTrack or GTCTrack portals. Anticipated costs for completion are approximately $75,000 to $100,000. These products may operate on the Iridium, Inmarsat, Globalstar or Thuraya satellite networks.

Industry and Market

We compete in the mobile satellite products and services sector of the global communications industry. The products and airtime that we sell are intended to meet users’ needs for connectivity in all locations where existing terrestrial wireline and wireless communications networks do not exist, do not provide sufficient coverage, or are impaired. Government organizations, including military and intelligence agencies and disaster response agencies, non-governmental organizations and industrial operations and support teams depend on mobile voice and data satellite communications products and services on a regular basis. Businesses with global operations require reliable communications services when operating in remote locations around the world. Mobile satellite services users span many sectors, including emergency services, maritime, aviation, government, utilities, oil and gas, mining, recreation, forestry, heavy equipment, construction, and transportation, among others. Many of our customers view satellite communications products and services as critical to their daily operations.

There is an existing, and we believe significantly growing, multi-billion-dollar global market for a small and cost effective solution for receiving and processing mobile voice and data communications from remote locations used in applications such as tracking vehicles or asset shipments, monitoring unattended remote assets or mobile security. Over the past two decades, the global mobile satellite services market has experienced significant growth. Increasingly, better-tailored, improved-technology products and services are creating new channels of demand for mobile satellite services. Growth in demand for mobile satellite voice services is driven by the declining cost of these services, the diminishing size and lower costs of the devices, as well as heightened demand by governments, businesses and individuals for ubiquitous global voice and data coverage. We believe our solutions are ideally suited for industries such as maritime, aviation, government/military, emergency/humanitarian services, mining, forestry, oil and gas, heavy equipment, transportation and utilities, as well as recreational users. We do not tailor our products and services to different types of customers as in our experience military, non-profit, government and recreational users tend to purchase the same types of products and services.

Competition

The competitors for our satellite telecommunications services and products are other leading satellite networks such as Iridium, Inmarsat, Thuraya and Globalstar, and their various resellers such as Network Innovations, Applied Satellite Technology (AST) and Satcom Global, some of which are also our suppliers. We expect the competition for our satellite telecommunications services and our satellite tracking and monitoring services to increase significantly as the market demand accelerates. We believe that we will be well positioned to compete for the satellite telecommunications services business largely on a cost basis and due to our global presence with various websites and Amazon storefronts. We believe that we will be able to compete in the MSS market due to our competitive pricing, varied products and easy to use website and Amazon storefront.

Intellectual Property

Our success and ability to compete depends in part on our ability to maintain our trade secrets. All of our employees and consultants are subject to non-disclosure agreements and other contractual provisions to establish and maintain our proprietary rights. In connection with the purchase of the contracts from GTC and related agreements, GTC and its parent World Surveillance Group, Inc. agreed to keep confidential certain information. In February 2015, we purchased certain software, including electronic files required for the development of dual mode trackers. On October 13, 2015, we purchased appliques, which are demodulator and RF interfaces located at various ground stations for gateways.

Research and Development

On February 19, 2015, the Company issued 1,000,000 shares of common stock (6,667 post-split shares of common stock), at $0.05 per share ($7.50 per share post-split), or $50,000, to a consultant as compensation for the design and delivery of dual mode GSM/Globalstar Simplex tracking devices and related hardware and intellectual property. For the fiscal years ending December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 there were no expenditures on research and development.

Regulatory Matters

Government contract laws and regulations affect how we will do business with our customers, and in some instances, will impose added costs on our business. A violation of specific laws and regulations could result in the imposition of fines and penalties, the termination of any then existing contracts or the inability to bid on future contracts. We intend our Orbital Sub to become qualified as a government contractor.

International sales of our products may also be subject to U.S. and foreign laws, regulations and policies like the United States Department of State restrictions on the transfer of technology, International Traffic in Arms Regulation (“ITAR”) and other export laws and regulations and may be subject to first obtaining licenses, clearances or authorizations from various regulatory entities. This may limit our ability to sell our products abroad and the failure to comply with any of these regulations could adversely affect our ability to conduct our business and generate revenues as well as increasing our operating costs. Our products may also be subject to regulation by the National Telecommunications and Information Administration and the Federal Communications Commission that regulate wireless communications.

Sources and Availability of Components

Certain materials and equipment for our products are custom made for those products and are dependent upon either a single or limited number of suppliers. Failure of a supplier could cause delays in delivery of the products if another supplier cannot promptly be found or if the quality of such replacement supplier’s components are inferior or unacceptable.

Employees

We currently have nine full time and one part time employee, not including David Phipps, our Chief Executive Officer and President, and Theresa Carlise, our Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Phipps and Ms. Carlise work for us full time.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Risks Related to Our Business

We have a history of net losses and we are uncertain about our future profitability.

We have incurred significant net losses since our inception. For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, we have incurred net losses of $3.9 million, $2.6 million in 2016 and $2.1 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2017, we had an accumulated deficit of $8,540,715. If our revenue grows more slowly than currently anticipated, or if operating expenses are higher than expected, we may be unable to consistently achieve profitability, our financial condition will suffer, and the value of our common stock could decline. Even if we are successful increasing our sales, we may incur losses in the foreseeable future as we continue to develop and market our products.

If sales revenue from any of our current products or any additional products that we develop in the future is insufficient, or if our product development is delayed, we may be unable to achieve profitability. Furthermore, even if we are able to achieve profitability, we may be unable to sustain or increase such profitability on a quarterly or annual basis, which would significantly reduce the value of our common stock.

If we are unable to continue as a going concern, our securities will have little or no value.

The report of our independent registered public accounting firm that accompanies our audited consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 contain a going concern qualification in which such firm expressed substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. At December 31, 2017, we had an accumulated deficit of $8,540,715 and negative working capital of $122,634, and a net loss of $3,939,309 during the year ended December 31, 2017. These factors raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Our consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result if we are unable to continue as a going concern. If we are unable to continue as a going concern, holders of our common stock might lose their entire investment.

We plan to attempt to raise additional equity capital through one or more private placement or public offerings. However, the doubts raised, relating to our ability to continue as a going concern, may make our shares an unattractive investment for potential investors. These factors, among others, may make it difficult to raise any additional capital.

Our dependence on key suppliers puts us at risk of interruptions in the availability of our products, which could reduce our revenue and adversely affect our results of operations. In addition, increases in prices for components used in our products could adversely affect our results of operations.

We require the timely delivery of sufficient amounts of materials and components, some of which are custom made, to manufacture our products. For reasons of quality assurance, cost effectiveness or availability, we procure certain materials and components from a single or limited number of suppliers. We generally acquire such materials and components through purchase orders placed in the ordinary course of business, and as a result we may not have a significant inventory of these materials and components and generally do not have any guaranteed or contractual supply arrangements with many of these suppliers. Our reliance on these supplier’s subjects us to risks that could harm our business, including, but not limited to, difficulty locating and qualifying alternative suppliers.

Our dependence on third-party suppliers involves several other risks, including limited control over pricing, availability, quality and delivery schedules. Suppliers of materials and components may decide, or be required, for reasons beyond our control, to cease supplying materials and components to us or to raise their prices. Shortages of materials, quality control problems, production capacity constraints or delays by our suppliers could negatively affect our ability to meet our production requirements and result in increased prices for affected materials or components. We may also face delays, yield issues and quality control problems if we are required to locate and secure new sources of supply. While we have not experienced any to date, any material shortage, constraint or delay may result in delays in shipments of our products, which could materially adversely affect our results of operations. Increases in prices for materials and components used in our products could also materially adversely affect our results of operations.

We may need to raise additional capital to grow our business and satisfy our anticipated future liquidity needs, and we may not be able to raise it on terms acceptable to us, or at all.

Growing and operating our business will require significant cash outlays, liquidity reserves and capital expenditures and commitments to respond to business challenges, including developing or enhancing new or existing products. As of December 31, 2017, we had cash on hand of $233,326. If cash on hand and cash generated from operations are not sufficient to meet our cash and liquidity needs, we may need to seek additional capital, potentially through debt or equity financings. To the extent that we raise additional capital through the sale of additional equity or convertible securities, your ownership interest may be diluted, and the terms of these securities may include liquidation or other preferences that adversely affect your rights as a stockholder. Debt financing, if available, would result in increased fixed payment obligations and a portion of our operating cash flows, if any, being dedicated to the payment of principal and interest on such indebtedness. In addition, debt financing may involve agreements that include restrictive covenants that impose operating restrictions, such as restrictions on the incurrence of additional debt, the making of certain capital expenditures or the declaration of dividends. Any additional fundraising efforts may divert our management from their day-to-day activities, which may adversely affect our ability to develop and commercialize our products. Even if we believe we have sufficient funds for our current or future operating plans, we may seek additional capital if market conditions are favorable or in light of specific strategic considerations. If we are unable to obtain funding on a timely basis, we may be required to significantly curtail, delay or discontinue one or more of our research or product candidate development programs or the commercialization of any product candidate or be unable to expand our operations or otherwise capitalize on our business opportunities, as desired, which could materially affect our business, operating results and prospects and cause the price of the common stock to decline.

Product development is a long, expensive and uncertain process.

The development of our own branded range of satellite tracking devices is a costly, complex and time-consuming process, and the investment in product development often involves a long wait until a return, if any, is achieved on such investment. Investments in new technology and processes are inherently speculative. We have experienced numerous setbacks and delays in our research and development efforts and may encounter further obstacles in the course of the development of additional technologies and products. We may not be able to overcome these obstacles or may have to expend significant additional funds and time. Technical obstacles and challenges we encounter in our research and development process may result in delays in or abandonment of product commercialization, may substantially increase the costs of development, and may negatively affect our results of operations.

Successful technical development of our products does not guarantee successful commercialization.

We may successfully complete the technical development for one or all of our product development programs, but still fail to develop a commercially successful product for a number of reasons, including among others the following:

Our success in the market for the products we develop will depend largely on our ability to prove our products’ capabilities. Upon demonstration, our satellite ground stations and tracking devices may not have the capabilities they were designed to have or that we believed they would have. Furthermore, even if we do successfully demonstrate our products’ capabilities, potential customers may be more comfortable doing business with a larger, more established, more proven company than us. Moreover, competing products may prevent us from gaining wide market acceptance of our products. Significant revenue from new product investments may not be achieved for a number of years, if at all.

If we fail to protect our intellectual property rights, we could lose our ability to compete in the marketplace.

Our intellectual property and proprietary rights are important to our ability to remain competitive and for the success of our products and our business. We rely on a combination of trademark and trade secret laws as well as confidentiality agreements and procedures, non-compete agreements and other contractual provisions to protect our intellectual property, other proprietary rights and our brand. We have confidentiality agreements in place with our consultants, Globalstar, customers and certain business suppliers and plan to require future employees to enter into confidentiality and non-compete agreements. We have little protection when we must rely on trade secrets and nondisclosure agreements. Our intellectual property rights may be challenged, invalidated or circumvented by third parties. We may not be able to prevent the unauthorized disclosure or use of our technical knowledge or other trade secrets by employees or competitors. Furthermore, our competitors may independently develop technologies and products that are substantially equivalent or superior to our technologies and/or products, which could result in decreased revenues. Moreover, the laws of foreign countries may not protect our intellectual property rights to the same extent as the laws of the U.S. Litigation may be necessary to enforce our intellectual property rights which could result in substantial costs to us and substantial diversion of management attention. If we do not adequately protect our intellectual property, our competitors could use it to enhance their products. Our inability to adequately protect our intellectual property rights could adversely affect our business and financial condition, and the value of our brand and other intangible assets.

Other companies may claim that we infringe their intellectual property, which could materially increase our costs and harm our ability to generate future revenue and profit.

We do not believe that we infringe the proprietary rights of any third party but claims of infringement are becoming increasingly common and third parties may assert infringement claims against us. It may be difficult or impossible to identify, prior to receipt of notice from a third party, the trade secrets, patent position or other intellectual property rights of a third party, either in the United States or in foreign jurisdictions. Any such assertion may result in litigation or may require us to obtain a license for the intellectual property rights of third parties. If we are required to obtain licenses to use any third-party technology, we would have to pay royalties, which may significantly reduce any profit on our products. In addition, any such litigation could be expensive and disruptive to our ability to generate revenue or enter into new market opportunities. If any of our products were found to infringe other parties’ proprietary rights and we are unable to come to terms regarding a license with such parties, we may be forced to modify our products to make them non-infringing or to cease production of such products altogether.

The decision by British voters to exit the European Union may negatively impact our operations.

The June 2016 referendum by British voters to exit the European Union (“Brexit”) adversely impacted global markets and resulted in a sharp decline in the value of the British pound, as compared to the U.S. dollar and other currencies. As the U.K. negotiates its exit from the European Union, volatility in exchange rates and in U.K. interest rates may continue. In the near term, a weaker British pound compared to the U.S. dollar during a reporting period causes local currency results of our U.K. operations to be translated into fewer U.S. dollars; a weaker British pound compared to other currencies increases the cost of goods imported into our U.K. operations and may decrease the profitability of our U.K. operations; and a higher U.K. interest rate may have a dampening effect on the U.K. economy. In the longer term, any impact from Brexit on our U.K. operations will depend, in part, on the outcome of tariff, trade, regulatory and other negotiations.

The nature of our business involves significant risks and uncertainties that may not be covered by insurance or indemnity.

We develop and sell products where insurance or indemnification may not be available, including:

Failure of certain of our products could result in loss of life or property damage. Certain products may raise questions with respect to issues of privacy rights, civil liberties, intellectual property, trespass, conversion and similar concepts, which may raise new legal issues. Indemnification to cover potential claims or liabilities resulting from a failure of technologies developed or deployed may be available in certain circumstances but not in others. We are not able to maintain insurance to protect against all operational risks and uncertainties. Substantial claims resulting from an accident, failure of our product, or liability arising from our products in excess of any indemnity or insurance coverage (or for which indemnity or insurance is not available or was not obtained) could harm our financial condition, cash flows, and operating results. Any accident, even if fully covered or insured, could negatively affect our reputation among our customers and the public, and make it more difficult for us to compete effectively.

Our sales may be impacted should there be a disruption of service to our Amazon online storefronts

The Company’s Amazon online marketplaces represented approximately 35.8% and 40.9% of total sales for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively and we anticipate that these marketplaces will continue to represent a significant portion of our sales for the foreseeable future. Should there be a disruption of Amazon services this may impact our sales adversely.

We are heavily reliant on David Phipps, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and the departure or loss of David Phipps could disrupt our business.

The Company depends heavily on the continued efforts of David Phipps, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and a director. Mr. Phipps is the founder of GTCL and is essential to the Company’s strategic vision and day-to-day operations and would be difficult to replace. Mr. Phipps’ two-year employment contract was automatically renewed at the end of its term, January 1, 2018, for another year and we cannot be certain that he will desire to continue with us for the duration of the employment term. The departure or loss of Mr. Phipps, or the inability to timely hire and retain a qualified replacement, could negatively impact the Company’s ability to manage its business.

If we are unable to recruit and retain key management, technical and sales personnel, our business would be negatively affected.

For our business to be successful, we need to attract and retain highly qualified technical, management and sales personnel. The failure to recruit additional key personnel when needed with specific qualifications and on acceptable terms or to retain good relationships with our partners might impede our ability to continue to develop, commercialize and sell our products. To the extent the demand for skilled personnel exceeds supply, we could experience higher labor, recruiting and training costs in order to attract and retain such employees. We face competition for qualified personnel from other companies with significantly more resources available to them and thus may not be able to attract the level of personnel needed for our business to succeed.

The control deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting may, until remedied, cause errors in our financial statements or cause our filings with the SEC to not be timely.

We believe our disclosure controls and procedures were ineffective due to our limited internal audit functions and lack of ability to have multiple levels of transaction review in our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, including those related to (i) a lack of segregation of duties within accounting functions, and (ii) the need for a new accounting system to effectively manage our increased volume of transactions. If our internal control over financial reporting or disclosure controls and procedures are not effective, there may be errors in our financial statements that could require a restatement or our filings may not be timely made with the SEC. We intend to implement additional corporate governance and control measures to strengthen our control environment as we are able, but we may not achieve our desired objectives. Moreover, no control environment, no matter how well designed and operated, can prevent or detect all errors or fraud. We may identify material weaknesses and control deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting in the future that may require remediation and could lead to investors losing confidence in our reported financial information, which could lead to a decline in our stock price.

Risks Related to Our Organization and Our Common Stock

Certain shareholders will be able to exert significant influence over us to the detriment of minority stockholders.

Our ten largest shareholders beneficially own approximately 51.1% of our outstanding common stock as of March 30, 2018, as calculated according to voting power. These stockholders, if they act together, will be able to exert significant influence on our management and affairs and all matters requiring stockholder approval, including significant corporate transactions. This concentration of ownership may have the effect of delaying or preventing our change in control and might affect the market price of our common stock.

You may experience dilution of your ownership interests because of the future issuance of additional shares of our common or preferred stock or other securities that are convertible into or exercisable for our common or preferred stock.

We are authorized to issue an aggregate of 750,000,000 shares of common stock and 50,000,000 shares of “blank check” preferred stock. In the future, we may issue our authorized but previously unissued equity securities, resulting in the dilution of the ownership interests of our present stockholders. We may issue additional shares of our common stock or other securities that are convertible into or exercisable for our common stock in connection with hiring or retaining employees, future acquisitions, future sales of our securities for capital raising purposes, or for other business purposes. The future issuance of any such additional shares of our common stock may create downward pressure on the trading price of the common stock. We will need to raise additional capital in the near future to meet our working capital needs, and there can be no assurance that we will not be required to issue additional shares, warrants or other convertible securities in the future in conjunction with these capital raising efforts, including at a price (or exercise or conversion prices) below the price an investor paid for stock.

Conversion of our outstanding preferred stock may dilute the ownership interest of existing stockholders or may otherwise depress the price of our common stock.

The conversion of some or all of our outstanding Series B Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series B Preferred Stock”), Series C Preferred Stock, Series D Preferred Stock, Series E Preferred Stock, Series F Preferred Stock, Series G Preferred Stock, Series H Preferred Stock, Series I Preferred Stock, Series J Preferred Stock and Series K Preferred Stock will dilute the ownership interests of existing stockholders. On December 5, 2017, by consent of a majority of the preferred holders in each class the beneficial ownership conversion limitation was increased from 4.99% to 9.99% of then outstanding common. We have authorized 20,000 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series A Preferred Stock”) and currently have no Series A Preferred Stock outstanding. Any sales in the public market of the common stock issuable upon such conversion could adversely affect prevailing market prices of our common stock. In addition, the existence of the preferred stock may encourage short selling by market participants because the conversion of the preferred stock could be used to satisfy short positions, or anticipated conversion of the preferred stock into shares of our common stock could depress the price of our common stock.

The total number of shares of preferred stock authorized, preferred stock issued and outstanding as of March 30, 2018 and common stock that may be issued upon conversion of each class of preferred stock as of March 30, 2018 is set forth below as affected by the reverse split of 1 for 150 on March 8, 2018:

Even though the holders of the convertible preferred stock may not convert these securities if they would own more than 9.99% of the then-outstanding common stock, this restriction does not prevent these holders from selling some of their holdings and then converting additional shares. In this way, the holders could sell more than these limits while never holding more than those limits.

We do not anticipate paying dividends on our common stock, and investors may lose the entire amount of their investment.

Cash dividends have never been declared or paid on our common stock, and we do not anticipate such a declaration or payment for the foreseeable future. We expect to use future earnings, if any, to fund business growth. Therefore, stockholders will not receive any funds absent a sale of their shares of common stock. If we do not pay dividends, our common stock may be less valuable because a return on your investment will only occur if our stock price appreciates. We cannot assure stockholders of a positive return on their investment when they sell their shares, nor can we assure that stockholders will not lose the entire amount of their investment.

Being a public company is expensive and administratively burdensome.

As a public reporting company, we are subject to the information and reporting requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) and other federal securities laws, rules and regulations related thereto, including compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Complying with these laws and regulations requires the time and attention of our Board of Directors and management and increases our expenses. We estimate the Company will incur approximately $200,000 to $300,000 annually in connection with being a public company.

Among other things, we are required to:

The costs of preparing and filing annual and quarterly reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC and furnishing audited reports to stockholders are expensive and much greater than that of a privately-held company, and compliance with these rules and regulations may require us to hire additional financial reporting, internal controls and other finance personnel, and will involve a material increase in regulatory, legal and accounting expenses and the attention of management. There can be no assurance that we will be able to comply with the applicable regulations in a timely manner, if at all. In addition, being a public company makes it more expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance. In the future, we may be required to accept reduced coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain this coverage.

Public company compliance may make it more difficult to attract and retain officers and directors.

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act and new rules subsequently implemented by the SEC have required changes in corporate governance practices of public companies. As a public company, we expect these new rules and regulations to increase our compliance costs in 2018 and beyond and to make certain activities more time consuming and costly. As a public company, we also expect that these new rules and regulations may make it more difficult and expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance in the future and we may be required to accept reduced policy limits and coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain the same or similar coverage. As a result, it may be more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified persons to serve on our Board of Directors or as executive officers.

You could lose all of your investment.

An investment in our securities is speculative and involves a high degree of risk. Potential investors should be aware that the value of an investment in the Company may go down as well as up. In addition, there can be no certainty that the market value of an investment in the Company will fully reflect its underlying value. You could lose your entire investment.

The ability of our Board of Directors to issue additional stock may prevent or make more difficult certain transactions, including a sale or merger of the Company.

Our Board of Directors is authorized to issue up to 50,000,000 shares of preferred stock with powers, rights and preferences designated by it. See “Preferred Stock” in the section of this Current Report titled “Description of Securities.” Shares of voting or convertible preferred stock could be issued, or rights to purchase such shares could be issued, to create voting impediments or to frustrate persons seeking to effect a takeover or otherwise gain control of the Company. The ability of the Board of Directors to issue such additional shares of preferred stock, with rights and preferences it deems advisable, could discourage an attempt by a party to acquire control of the Company by tender offer or other means. Such issuances could therefore deprive stockholders of benefits that could result from such an attempt, such as the realization of a premium over the market price for their shares in a tender offer or the temporary increase in market price that such an attempt could cause. Moreover, the issuance of such additional shares of preferred stock to persons friendly to the Board of Directors could make it more difficult to remove incumbent officers and directors from office even if such change were to be favorable to stockholders generally.

Our stock may be traded infrequently and in low volumes, so you may be unable to sell your shares at or near the quoted bid prices if you need to sell your shares.

Until our common stock is listed on a national securities exchange such as the New York Stock Exchange or the Nasdaq Stock Market, we expect our common stock to remain eligible for quotation on the OTC Markets, or on another over-the-counter quotation system, or in the “pink sheets.” In those venues, however, the shares of our common stock may trade infrequently and in low volumes, meaning that the number of persons interested in purchasing our common shares at or near bid prices at any given time may be relatively small or non-existent. An investor may find it difficult to obtain accurate quotations as to the market value of our common stock or to sell his or her shares at or near bid prices or at all. In addition, if we fail to meet the criteria set forth in SEC regulations, various requirements would be imposed by law on broker-dealers who sell our securities to persons other than established customers and accredited investors. Consequently, such regulations may deter broker-dealers from recommending or selling our common stock, which may further affect the liquidity of our common stock. This would also make it more difficult for us to raise capital.

There currently is no active public market for our common stock and there can be no assurance that an active public market will ever develop. Failure to develop or maintain a trading market could negatively affect the value of our common stock and make it difficult or impossible for you to sell your shares.

There is currently no active public market for shares of our common stock and one may never develop. Our common stock is quoted on the OTC Markets. The OTC Markets is a thinly traded market and lacks the liquidity of certain other public markets with which some investors may have more experience. We may not ever be able to satisfy the listing requirements for our common stock to be listed on a national securities exchange, which is often a more widely-traded and liquid market. Some, but not all, of the factors which may delay or prevent the listing of our common stock on a more widely-traded and liquid market include the following: our stockholders’ equity may be insufficient; the market value of our outstanding securities may be too low; our net income from operations may be too low; our common stock may not be sufficiently widely held; we may not be able to secure market makers for our common stock; and we may fail to meet the rules and requirements mandated by the several exchanges and markets to have our common stock listed. Should we fail to satisfy the initial listing standards of the national exchanges, or our common stock is otherwise rejected for listing, and remains listed on the OTC Markets or is suspended from the OTC Markets, the trading price of our common stock could suffer and the trading market for our common stock may be less liquid and our common stock price may be subject to increased volatility, making it difficult or impossible to sell shares of our common stock.

Our common stock is subject to the “penny stock” rules of the SEC and the trading market in the securities is limited, which makes transactions in the stock cumbersome and may reduce the value of an investment in the stock.

Rule 15g-9 under the Exchange Act establishes the definition of a “penny stock,” for the purposes relevant to us, as any equity security that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share or with an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. For any transaction involving a penny stock, unless exempt, the rules require: (a) that a broker or dealer approve a person’s account for transactions in penny stocks; and (b) the broker or dealer receive from the investor a written agreement to the transaction, setting forth the identity and quantity of the penny stock to be purchased.

In order to approve a person’s account for transactions in penny stocks, the broker or dealer must: (a) obtain financial information and investment experience objectives of the person and (b) make a reasonable determination that the transactions in penny stocks are suitable for that person and the person has sufficient knowledge and experience in financial matters to be capable of evaluating the risks of transactions in penny stocks.

The broker or dealer must also deliver, prior to any transaction in a penny stock, a disclosure schedule prescribed by the SEC relating to the penny stock market, which, in highlight form: (a) sets forth the basis on which the broker or dealer made the suitability determination; and (b) confirms that the broker or dealer received a signed, written agreement from the investor prior to the transaction. Generally, brokers may be less willing to execute transactions in securities subject to the “penny stock” rules. This may make it more difficult for investors to dispose of our common stock and cause a decline in the market value of our common stock.

Disclosure also has to be made about the risks of investing in penny stocks in both public offerings and in secondary trading and about the commissions payable to both the broker or dealer and the registered representative, current quotations for the securities and the rights and remedies available to an investor in cases of fraud in penny stock transactions. Finally, monthly statements have to be sent disclosing recent price information for the penny stock held in the account and information on the limited market in penny stocks.

Our stock price may be volatile.

The market price of our common stock is likely to be highly volatile and could fluctuate widely in price in response to various factors, many of which are beyond our control, including the following:

In addition, the securities markets have from time to time experienced significant price and volume fluctuations that are unrelated to the operating performance of particular companies. These market fluctuations may also materially and adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

Offers or availability for sale of a substantial number of shares of our common stock may cause the price of our common stock to decline.

If our stockholders sell substantial amounts of our common stock in the public market, including upon the expiration of any statutory holding period under Rule 144, or issued upon the conversion of preferred stock or exercise of warrants, it could create a circumstance commonly referred to as an “overhang” and in anticipation of which the market price of our common stock could fall. The existence of an overhang, whether or not sales have occurred or are occurring, also could make more difficult our ability to raise additional financing through the sale of equity or equity-related securities in the future at a time and price that we deem reasonable or appropriate.

Investor relations activities, nominal “float” and supply and demand factors may affect the price of our stock.

The Company expects to utilize various techniques such as non-deal road shows and investor relations campaigns in order to create investor awareness for the Company. These campaigns may include personal, video and telephone conferences with investors and prospective investors in which our business practices are described. The Company may provide compensation to investor relations firms and pay for newsletters, websites, mailings and email campaigns that are produced by third-parties based upon publicly-available information concerning the Company. The Company does not intend to review or approve the content of such analysts’ reports or other materials based upon analysts’ own research or methods. Investor relations firms should generally disclose when they are compensated for their efforts, but whether such disclosure is made or complete is not under our control. In addition, investors in the Company may, from time to time, also take steps to encourage investor awareness through similar activities that may be undertaken at the expense of the investors. Investor awareness activities may also be suspended or discontinued which may impact the trading market our common stock.

The SEC and FINRA enforce various statutes and regulations intended to prevent manipulative or deceptive devices in connection with the purchase or sale of any security and carefully scrutinize trading patterns and company news and other communications for false or misleading information, particularly in cases where the hallmarks of “pump and dump” activities may exist, such as rapid share price increases or decreases. We, and our shareholders may be subjected to enhanced regulatory scrutiny due to the small number of holders who initially will own the registered shares of our common stock publicly available for resale, and the limited trading markets in which such shares may be offered or sold which have often been associated with improper activities concerning penny-stocks, such as the OTCQB Marketplace or the OTCPink Marketplace (Pink OTC) or pink sheets. Until such time as our restricted shares are registered or available for resale under Rule 144, there will continue to be a small percentage of shares held by a small number of investors, many of whom acquired such shares in privately negotiated purchase and sale transactions, which will constitute the entire available trading market. The Supreme Court has stated that manipulative action is a term of art connoting intentional or willful conduct designed to deceive or defraud investors by controlling or artificially affecting the price of securities. Often times, manipulation is associated by regulators with forces that upset the supply and demand factors that would normally determine trading prices. Since a small percentage of the outstanding common stock of the Company will initially be available for trading, held by a small number of individuals or entities, the supply of our common stock for sale will be extremely limited for an indeterminate amount of time, which could result in higher bids, asks or sales prices than would otherwise exist. Securities regulators have often cited factors such as thinly-traded markets, small numbers of holders, and awareness campaigns as hallmarks of claims of price manipulation and other violations of law when combined with manipulative trading, such as wash sales, matched orders or other manipulative trading timed to coincide with false or touting press releases. There can be no assurance that the Company’s or third-parties’ activities, or the small number of potential sellers or small percentage of stock in the “float,” or determinations by purchasers or holders as to when or under what circumstances or at what prices they may be willing to buy or sell stock will not artificially impact (or would be claimed by regulators to have affected) the normal supply and demand factors that determine the price of the stock.

Effects of the Reverse Stock Split

On March 8, 2018, our then-outstanding 140,224,577 shares of common stock outstanding were reduced by a reversed split for a ratio of 1 for 150. As of March 30, 2018, we have 936,519 shares of common stock issued and outstanding post-split.

The number of authorized shares of our common stock will not be reduced by the reverse stock split. Accordingly, the reverse Stock split will have the effect of creating additional unissued and unreserved shares of our common stock. We have no current arrangements or understandings providing for the issuance of any of the additional authorized and unreserved shares of our common stock that would be available as a result of the proposed reverse stock split. However, these additional shares may be used by us for various purposes in the future without further stockholder approval (subject to applicable Nasdaq Marketplace Rules, if applicable), including, among other things: (i) raising capital necessary to fund our future operations, (ii) providing equity incentives to our employees, executive officers, directors and consultants, (iii) entering into collaborations and other strategic relationships and (iv) expanding our business through the acquisition of other businesses or products.

Although the Board expects that the reduction in outstanding shares of common stock will result in an increase in the per share price of the Company’s common stock, there is no assurance that such a result will occur. Similarly, there is no assurance that if the per share price of the Company’s common stock increases as a result of the reverse stock split, such increase in the per share price will be permanent, which will be dependent on several factors:

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

Item 2. Description of Property.

We rent our office space at 18851 N.E. 29th Ave, Suite 700, Aventura, Florida 33180 for $175 per month and our facilities in Poole, England for £1,833 per month, or $2,361 per month at the yearly average conversation rate of 1.288190.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings.

From time to time, we may become involved in litigation relating to claims arising out of our operations in the normal course of business. We are not currently involved in any pending legal proceeding or litigation and, to the best of our knowledge, no governmental authority is contemplating any proceeding to which we are a party or to which any of our properties is subject, which would reasonably be likely to have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not applicable.

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

Market Information

Our common stock is currently eligible for quotation and trades on the OTC Markets under the symbol “TRKK.” The quotation of our common stock under this symbol began on February 20, 2015. Prior to such date our common stock was eligible for quotation and traded under the symbol “GWST” from May 16, 2014. Prior to such date our common stock was eligible for quotation and traded under the symbol “SILV” from May 2011.

On February 28, 2018, a majority of our shareholders gave their written consent approving a reverse split of our common stock at a ratio of 1 for 150. We have been notified by FINRA that the market effective date for the reverse split will be March 8, 2018. Effective March 8, 2018, our trading symbol will be changed to “TRKKD” for a period of twenty business days, after which it will revert to “TRKK.” As a result of the reverse split, our common stock will have the following new CUSIP number: 68558X209. All share and per share, information in the Form 10K and accompanying consolidated financial statements and footnotes has been retroactively restated to reflect the reverse split.

The following table sets forth the high and low closing bid prices for our common stock for the fiscal quarter indicated as reported on OTC Markets, as adjusted for our 150:1 reverse split approved by FINRA April 21, 2014 and our further 150:1 reverse split approved by FINRA March 8, 2018. The quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not represent actual transactions. Our common stock is very thinly traded and, thus, pricing of our common stock on OTC Markets does not necessarily represent its fair market value. The last reported sales price of our common stock on the OTC Markets on March 29, 2018 was $2.90 per share

Equity Compensation Plan Information

As of December 31, 2017, we had issued and outstanding options to purchase 1,511 shares of common stock. The weighted average exercise price of the options was $1.95. The foregoing securities were not issued under any equity compensation plan.

The following table provides pre-split information about our equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2017:

Holders

As of March 30, 2018, we had 936,519 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding held by approximately 447 stockholders of record.

Dividend Policy

We have never paid any cash dividends on our capital stock and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. We intend to retain future earnings to fund ongoing operations and future capital requirements. Any future determination to pay cash dividends will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will be dependent upon financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements and such other factors as the Board of Directors deems relevant.

Item 6. Selected Financial Data.

We qualify as a smaller reporting company, as defined by Rule 229.10(f) (1), and are not required to provide the information required by this Item.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Cautionary Notice Regarding Forward Looking Statements

This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 including those relating to our liquidity, our belief that we will not have sufficient cash and borrowing capacity to meet our working capital needs for the next 12 months without further financing, our expectations regarding acquisitions and new lines of business, gross profit, gross margins and capital expenditures. Additionally, words such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “believes,” “will” and similar words are used to identify forward-looking statements.

Some or all of the results anticipated by these forward-looking statements may not occur. Important factors, uncertainties and risks that may cause actual results to differ materially from these forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the Risk Factors which appear in our filings and reports made with the Securities and Exchange Commission, our lack of working capital, the value of our securities, the impact of competition, the continuation or worsening of current economic conditions, technology and technological changes, a potential decrease in consumer spending and the condition of the domestic and global credit and capital markets. Additionally, these forward-looking statements are presented as of the date this Form 10-K is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We do not intend to update any of these forward-looking statements.

This discussion should be read in conjunction with the other sections of this Report, including “Risk Factors,” “Description of Business” and the Financial Statements attached hereto pursuant and the related exhibits. The various sections of this discussion contain a number of forward-looking statements, all of which are based on our current expectations and could be affected by the uncertainties and risk factors described throughout this Report.

The following discussion provides information which management believes is relevant to an assessment and understanding of our results of operations and financial condition. The discussion should be read along with our financial statements and notes thereto contained elsewhere in this annual report. The following discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements, which involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ significantly from the results, expectations and plans discussed in these forward-looking statements.

Overview

On January 22, 2015, the Company changed its name to “Orbital Tracking Corp.” from “Great West Resources, Inc.” pursuant to a merger with a newly-formed wholly owned subsidiary.

On March 28, 2014, the Company merged with a newly-formed wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company solely for the purpose of changing its state of incorporation to Nevada from Delaware, effecting a 1:150 reverse split of its common stock, and changing its name to Great West Resources, Inc. in connection with the plans to enter into the business of potash mining and exploration. During late 2014, the Company abandoned its efforts to enter the potash business.

The Company was originally incorporated in 1997 as a Florida corporation. On April 21, 2010, the Company merged with and into a newly-formed wholly-owned subsidiary for the purpose of changing its state of incorporation to Delaware, effecting a 2:1 forward split of its common stock, and changing its name to EClips Media Technologies, Inc. On April 25, 2011, the Company changed its name to “Silver Horn Mining Ltd.” pursuant to a merger with a newly-formed wholly-owned subsidiary.

We are a provider of satellite-based hardware, airtime and related services both in the United States and internationally. We sell equipment and airtime for use on all of the major satellite networks including Globalstar, Inmarsat, Iridium and Thuraya and operate a short-term rental service for customers who desire to use our equipment for a limited time period. Our acquisition of Global Telesat Communications Limited in February 2015 expanded our global satellite-based infrastructure and business, which was first launched in December 2014 through the purchase of certain contracts.

Recent Events

On July 7, 2017, the Company entered into an agreement for two years, with an underwriter, Viewtrade Securities Inc. “Representative”, to assist in effectuating a securities offering of $5,000,000 to $7,000,000. Viewtrade will act as the representative of a number of broker-dealers that will act as principal in purchasing the Securities Being Offered from the Company and to offer the Securities Being Offered in a public offering on a “Firm Commitment” basis. The Representative shall receive a gross discount equal to eight percent (8%) of the Public Offering Price on each Securities Being Offered sold in the Offering, with the exception of Securities Being Offered sold in the Offering, which are purchased by current shareholders of the Company, in which case the Representative shall receive a discount equal to three percent (3%) of the Public Offering Price. The Representative shall also have the right to reoffer all or any part of the Securities Being Offered to broker- dealers who are members of FINRA (“Selected Dealers”) and may allow a concession, to be determined by the Representative, to such Selected Dealers in accordance with the Conduct Rules of FINRA. For the purpose of covering over-allotments, the Company shall grant to the Representative an option to purchase a number of Securities Being Offered equal to fifteen percent (15%) of Securities Being Offered at the Public Offering Price, in whole or in part, from time to time, only during a period of forty-five (45) days from the Effective Date. Viewtrade shall be entitled to an expense allowance equal to one percent (1%) of the aggregate gross proceeds of the offering (the “Expense Allowance”). Said Expense Allowance is intended to cover the internal expenses of the Representative incurred by it in connection with the offering. At the closing of the proposed offering, the Company shall sell to the Representative and/or its designees (the “Holders”), the Representative Warrants. The Representative’s Warrants shall be for that number of Securities Being Offered equal to eight percent (8%) of the total number of Securities Being Offered sold in the public offering and the Representative Warrants shall have a cashless exercise provision. The warrants to be sold by the Company to the Representative and/or persons related to the Representative for nominal consideration of $0.0001, each such warrant evidencing the right to purchase one share of the Securities Being Offered at an exercise price equal to 110% of the Public Offering Price and which shall be exercisable for a period of five years. The number of Representative Warrants shall be equal to 8% of the total number of Securities sold in the offering.

Effective March 8, 2018, we conducted a reverse split of our common stock at a ratio of 1 for 150. Beginning March 8, 2018, our trading symbol was changed to “TRKKD” for a period of twenty business days, after which it will revert to “TRKK.” As a result of the reverse split, our common stock has the following new CUSIP number: 68558X209. See Note 10 Stockholders Equity, in the accompanying consolidated financial statements and footnotes has been retroactively restated to reflect the reverse split.

We had net cash used in operations of approximately $315,245 during the year ended December 31, 2017. At December 31, 2017, we had negative working capital of approximately $122,634. Additionally, at December 31, 2017, we had an accumulated deficit of approximately $8,540,715 and stockholder’s equity of $1,859,566. These matters and our expected needs for capital investments required to support operational growth raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Our consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible effects on recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that may result from our inability to continue as a going concern.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. Preparing financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses. These estimates and assumptions are affected by management’s applications of accounting policies. Critical accounting policies for our company include accounting for derivative liabilities and stock-based compensation.

Stock Based Compensation

Stock-based compensation is accounted for based on the requirements of the Share-Based Payment Topic of ASC 718 which requires recognition in the consolidated financial statements of the cost of employee and director services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments over the period the employee or director is required to perform the services in exchange for the award (presumptively, the vesting period). The ASC also requires measurement of the cost of employee and director services received in exchange for an award based on the grant-date fair value of the award.

Pursuant to ASC Topic 505-50, for share-based payments to consultants and other third parties, compensation expense is determined at the “measurement date.” The expense is recognized over the vesting period of the award. Until the measurement date is reached, the total amount of compensation expense remains uncertain. The Company initially records compensation expense based on the fair value of the award at the reporting date.

Use of Estimates

In preparing the consolidated financial statements, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the statements of financial condition, and revenues and expenses for the years then ended. Actual results may differ significantly from those estimates. Significant estimates made by management include, but are not limited to, the assumptions used to calculate stock-based compensation, derivative liabilities, preferred deemed dividend and common stock issued for services.

Effect of Exchange Rate on Results

The Company’s reporting currency is US Dollars. The accounts of one of the Company’s subsidiaries, GTCL, is maintained using the appropriate local currency, Great British Pound, as the functional currency. All assets and liabilities are translated into U.S. Dollars at balance sheet date, shareholders’ equity is translated at historical rates and revenue and expense accounts are translated at the average exchange rate for the year or the reporting period. The translation adjustments are reported as a separate component of stockholders’ equity, captioned as accumulated other comprehensive (loss) gain. Transaction gains and losses arising from exchange rate fluctuations on transactions denominated in a currency other than the functional currency are included in the statements of operations.

The relevant translation rates are as follows: for the year ended December 31, 2017 closing rate at 1.350291 US$: GBP, average rate at 1.288190 US$: GBP and for the year ended 2016 closing rate at 1.2345 US$: GBP, average rate at 1.35585 US$: GBP.

Global Telesat Communications LTD, (GTCL) represents 66.5% of total company sales and as such, currency rate variances have an impact on results. For the year ended December 31, 2017 the net effect on revenues were impacted by the differences in exchange rate from yearly average exchange of 1.35585 to 1.288190. Had the yearly average rate remained, sales would have been higher by $209,615. GTCL comparable sales in GBP, its home currency, increased 22.5% or £569,628, from £2,528,484 to £3,098,112 for the year ended December 31, 2017 as compared to December 31, 2016.

Results of Operations

Net Revenue. For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, revenues generated were approximately $6,004,955 and $4,698,638, an increase of $1,306,317 or 27.8%. Revenues were derived primarily from the sales of satellite phones, locator beacons, GPS trackers, terminals, accessories and additional and recurring airtime plans. Comparable sales for Orbital Satcom Corp increased 58.5% or $743,603, from $1,270,392 to $2,013,995. Comparable sales for Global Telesat Communications LTD increased 16.4% or $562,714, from $3,428,246 to $3,990,960. The sales increase is attributable to additional product lines being introduced by the company, the adding of additional marketplaces for its online presence, offset by exchange rate variances as described above.

Cost of Sales. During the years ended December 31, 2017, cost of revenues increased to $4,854,216 compared to $3,623,516 for the year ended December 31, 2016, an increase of $1,230,700 or 34.0%. We expect our cost of revenues to continue to increase during fiscal 2018 and beyond, as we expand our operations and begin generating additional revenues under our current business. However, we are unable at this time to estimate the amount of the expected increases. Gross profit margins during the year ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 were 19.2% and 22.9% respectively. The decline in margin was attributable to an increase in sales to resellers which have a lower profit margin and increased competition in US marketplaces, such as Amazon.com.

Operating Expenses. Total operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2017 were $2,708,345, an increase of $2,699, or 0.1%, from total operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2016, of $2,705,646.

Selling, general and administrative expenses were $583,900 and $566,186 for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, an increase of $17,714 or 3.1%. The increase is attributable to increases variable costs, which increase with revenue, such as credit card processing fees, online service fees, bank charges, advertising and marketing.

Salaries, wages and payroll taxes were $688,589 and $664,705 for the year ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, an increase of $23,884, or 3.6%. The increase was attributable to costs associated with personnel; to support the requirements for public companies, to support revenue goals and build the Company’s infrastructure for future growth and opportunities.

Stock based compensation were non-cash expenses, for fully vested options to purchase 200,000 shares of the Company’s stock at an exercise price of $1.50 to management and a director, for the year ended December 31, 2017 and 66,667 shares of Company’s stock at an exercise price of $1.50 per share, to the Company’s CEO. For the year ended December 31, 2016, stock-based compensation was $190,000.

Professional fees were $551,470 and $992,952 for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, a decrease of $441,482 or 44.5%. The decrease during the year ended December 31, 2017 as compared to the prior year in 2016, was attributable to the Company’s decreased investor relations costs of $538,370 offset by expenses related to the Company’s positioning for a NASDAQ up-listing and the engagement of an underwriter for a future offering.

Depreciation and amortization expenses were $284,386 and $291,803 for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, a decrease of $7,417, or 2.5%. The decrease was attributable to exchange rate variances and fully depreciated assets, primarily for website development, which had a two-year useful life.

We expect our expenses in each of these areas to continue to increase during fiscal 2018 and beyond as we expand our operations and begin generating additional revenues under our current business. However, we are unable at this time to estimate the amount of the expected increases.

Total Other (Income) Expense. Our total other expenses were $2,358,244 compared to $959,399 during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 respectively, an increase of $1,398,845 or 145.8%. The increase is primarily attributed to expense related to Series J Preferred stock issuance for price protection to certain Subscribers of Preferred Series C, Preferred Series F, Preferred Series G and Preferred Series H, in the amount of $2,308,981 as compared to price protection expense of $679,778, from the same period in 2016, and offset by a decrease of interest expense of $602,329 as well as a decrease in exchange rate variances of $52,885.

Net Loss before Income Taxes. We recorded net loss before income tax of $3,915,850 for the year ended December 31, 2017 as compared to a net loss of $2,589,923, for the year ended December 31, 2016. The increase is a result of the factors as described above.

Provision for Income Taxes and Income Tax Expense. The Company recorded income tax expense of $10,998 and a provision for income taxes of $12,461 for UK Taxes related to its subsidiary, Global Telesat Communications LTD.

Net Loss. We recorded net loss after income tax of $3,939,309 for the year ended December 31, 2017 as compared to a net loss of $2,589,923, for the year ended December 31, 2016. The increase is a result of the factors as described above.

Comprehensive Loss. We recorded a gain (loss) for foreign currency translation adjustments for the year ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, of $32,541 and $(20,678), respectively. The fluctuations of the increase/decrease are primarily attributed to the increase recognized due to exchange rate variances. Comprehensive loss was $3,906,678 as compared to loss of $2,610,601 for the year ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Liquidity is the ability of a company to generate funds to support its current and future operations, satisfy its obligations, and otherwise operate on an ongoing basis. At December 31, 2017, we had a cash balance of $233,326 and negative working capital is approximately $122,634 at December 31, 2017.

Our current assets at December 31, 2017 increased to $278,791, or 34.8%, to $1,080,898 from $802,107, from December 31, 2016. The increase included cash, accounts receivable, unbilled revenue and other current assets, relating to an increase in revenue, offset by a decrease in prepaid expenses and inventory. Prepaid expenses primarily represent services to consultants, which are amortized over the length of the contract and have been fully amortized.

Our current liabilities at December 31, 2017 increased to $1,203,532 from $720,617 or an increase of $482,915, or 67.0% from December 31, 2016. The increase is comprised of; our accounts payable, accrued expenses, deferred revenue, provision for income taxes, offset by a decrease in due to related party of $60,455 and derivative liability decrease of $1,237. As of December 31, 2017, and 2016, the Company had a derivative liability balance from a warrant which expired May 19, 2017, of $0 and $1,237, respectively.

Operating Activities

Net cash flows used in operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2017 amounted to $315,245 and were primarily attributable to our net loss of $3,939,309 and change in fair value of derivative liabilities of $1,237,offset by; stock based compensation of $600,000, depreciation and amortization expense of $284,386, amortization of prepaid expense for stock based compensation for services of $161,164, preferred stock-based price protection expense of $2,308,981 and imputed interest of $831 . Changes in operating assets and liabilities were reflected by increases in; accounts receivable of $197,737, unbilled revenue of $35,171, prepaid and other current assets of $90,826, deferred revenue of $213,365, provision for income taxes of $12,461 and accounts payable and accrued expenses of $365,475; and decreases in inventory of $2,372.

Net cash flows used in operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2016 amounted to $1,044,036 and were primarily attributable to our net loss of $2,589,923 offset by; stock based compensation of $190,000, depreciation and amortization expense of $291,803, amortization of notes payable discount of $602,515, amortization of prepaid expense for stock based compensation for services of $262,500, change in fair value of derivative liabilities, net $426,093, preferred stock-based price protection expense of $679,778 and imputed interest of $1,133. Changes in operating assets and liabilities were reflected by decreases in; accounts receivable of $19,960, unbilled revenue of $11,419 and prepaid and other current assets of $61,485, deferred revenue of $14,037, and accounts payable and accrued expenses of $50,827; and increases in inventory of $83,749.

Investing Activities

Net cash flows used in investing activities were $33,193 and $26,448 for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2017, we purchased property and equipment of $33,193. For the year ended December 31, 2016, purchase of property and equipment of $26,448.

Financing Activities

Net cash flows provided by financing activities were $439,545 and $242,568 for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2017, we had repayments of due to related party for $60,455 and proceeds from the sale of our Convertible Preferred Series J stock of $500,000. During the year ended December 31, 2016, we had repayments of convertible notes payable of $100,834 and repayments of related party payable of $6,598, offset by proceeds of the sale of our Convertible Preferred Series H stock of $350,000.

Off-balance Sheet Arrangements

We have not entered into any other financial guarantees or other commitments to guarantee the payment obligations of any third parties. We have not entered into any derivative contracts that are indexed to our shares and classified as stockholder’s equity or that are not reflected in our consolidated financial statements. Furthermore, we do not have any retained or contingent interest in assets transferred to an unconsolidated entity that serves as credit, liquidity or market risk support to such entity.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.

We qualify as a smaller reporting company, as defined by Rule 229.10(f)(1), and are not required to provide the information required by this Item.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

See pages F-1 through F-41.

Item 9. Changes In and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

Not applicable.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.

Management’s Conclusions Regarding Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As required by Rule 13a-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as of December 31, 2017, the end of the year covered by this report, our management concluded its evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures.

Disclosure controls and procedures refer to controls and other procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating and implementing possible controls and procedures.

Our management does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system’s objectives will be met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. The design of any system of controls is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions.

With respect to the fiscal year ending December 31, 2017, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operations of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Based upon our evaluation regarding the fiscal year ending December 31, 2017, our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, has concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were ineffective due to our limited internal audit functions and lack of ability to have multiple levels of transaction review. The Company has been actively addressing the evaluation and is pursuing upgrading its accounting software.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act. Our management is also required to assess and report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting in accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Section 404”). Management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017. In making this assessment, we used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control - Integrated Framework. During our assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, management identified significant deficiencies related to (i) our internal audit functions and (ii) a lack of segregation of duties within accounting functions. Therefore, our internal controls over financial reporting were not effective as of December 31, 2017.

Management has determined that our internal audit function is significantly deficient due to insufficient qualified resources to perform internal audit functions.

Due to our size and nature, segregation of all conflicting duties may not always be possible and may not be economically feasible. However, to the extent possible, we will implement procedures to assure that the initiation of transactions, the custody of assets and the recording of transactions will be performed by separate individuals.

We believe that the foregoing steps will remediate the significant deficiency identified above, and we will continue to monitor the effectiveness of these steps and make any changes that our management deems appropriate. Due to the nature of this significant deficiency in our internal control over financial reporting, there is more than a remote likelihood that misstatements which could be material to our annual or interim financial statements could occur that would not be prevented or detected.

A material weakness (within the meaning of PCAOB Auditing Standard No. 5) is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. A significant deficiency is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting that is less severe than a material weakness, yet important enough to merit attention by those responsible for oversight of the company’s financial reporting.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies and procedures may deteriorate.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit us to provide only management’s report in this annual report.

Changes in Internal Controls

There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the fourth quarter ended December 31, 2017 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

Item 9B. Other Information.

None.

PART III.

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.

The following table presents information with respect to our officers, directors and significant employees as of the date of this report:

Our directors are appointed for a one-year term to hold office until the next annual general meeting of our shareholders or until removed from office in accordance with our bylaws. The Board of Directors shall not appoint any new members or vote to increase its size in the absence of the written consent of Mr. Phipps. The Board of Directors elects officers and their terms of office are at the discretion of the Board of Directors.

Background of officers and directors

The following is a brief account of the education and business experience during at least the past five years of our officers and directors, indicating each person’s principal occupation during that period, and the name and principal business of the organization in which such occupation and employment were carried out.

David Phipps, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman, 52, has served as the Managing Director of GTCL since 2008 and as the President of GTC, a competitor of the Company, from 2003 through 2014. He has served as the President of Orbital Satcom since February 19, 2015, as Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company since February 24, 2015 and Chief Executive Officer since February 25, 2015. Mr. Phipps was chosen as a director of the Company based on his knowledge of and relationships in the global satellite communications business.

Hector Delgado, Director, 49, was appointed to the Board of Directors on May 27, 2015. Mr. Delgado is currently the Executive Officer of the Naval Reserve Special Operations Command South (SOCSOUTH) Detachment 108. He has also served as a Special Agent in the United States Department of Homeland Security since 1995 and as the Managing Member of ISR Strategies, LLC, a full-service security consulting company, since 2010. He is a United States Navy SEAL with active and reserve service for over twenty-eight years. In 2006, he was mobilized and served a combat tour in Ramadi, Iraq with SEAL Team THREE receiving a Navy Commendation Medal with Combat “V”. He has served with SEAL Teams TWO, THREE, FOUR, EIGHTEEN and Special Operations Command Central and South. Mr. Delgado has participated in tours of duty in the Middle East, Europe, Africa and South America. He has also served as an adjunct instructor at the United States Merchant Marine Academy teaching maritime security and conducting International Ship Security Code (ISPS) training and assessments. His managerial expertise has been refined not only in a military environment, but also extensively in the governmental sector, where he has been responsible for the budgets, training, and logistics of thousands of people. Mr. Delgado was chosen as a director of the Company based on his leadership and entrepreneurial experience and particular familiarity with the military and governmental agencies.

Theresa Carlise, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary, 59, was appointed Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary on June 9, 2015. She joined the Company from FTE Networks (OTCQX FTNW), a leading provider of infrastructure services for the telecommunications and wireless sector, where she served as a financial advisor from May 2014 through March 2015. Chief Financial Officer and director from September 2011 through May 2014. Prior to FTE Networks, she served as the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and a director of Control System & Instrumentation (CSI) Consultants, which provided information technology consulting and system design to the industrial and manufacturing sectors, from July 2010 to September 2011 and as Chief Financial Officer and a director of Las Vegas Railway Express, Inc. (OTCBB LVRE), a developer of passenger rail transportation and related ancillary services, from December 2009 through July 2010. Ms. Carlise also served as the Chief Financial Officer of Shearson Financial Network, Inc. (OTCBB SFNN), and as Chief Financial Officer, senior vice president and a director of National Record Mart, Inc., (NASDAQ NRMI). From October 2006 to November 2007 Ms. Carlise served as Chief Financial Officer of Shearson Financial Network, Inc., a direct to consumer mortgage banking company. Declining market conditions in the mortgage banking industry in 2007, contributed to the Company filing a voluntary petition under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code in June of 2008. Ms. Carlise holds a Bachelor of Science in Finance from Indiana University of Pennsylvania.

Family Relationships

There are no family relationships between any of our directors, executive officers or directors except as set forth herein.

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

During the past ten years, none of our officers, directors, promoters or control persons have been involved in any legal proceedings as described in Item 401(f) of Regulation S-K except as set forth herein.

Term of Office

Our directors are appointed for a one-year term to hold office until the next annual general meeting of our shareholders or until removed from office in accordance with our bylaws. The Board of Directors shall not appoint any new members or vote to increase its size in the absence of the written consent of Mr. Phipps.

Director Independence

Mr. Phipps is not an “independent” director based on the definition of independence in the listing standards of the NASDAQ Stock Market (“NASDAQ”). Mr. Delgado is an “independent” director based on the definition of independence in the listing standards of NASDAQ.

Committees of the Board of Directors

Audit Committee. We intend to establish an audit committee of the Board of Directors once we have satisfied the other initial listing standards for listing our common stock on NASDAQ or another national exchange. The audit committee will consist of independent directors, of which at least one director will qualify as a qualified financial expert as defined in Item 407(d)(5)(ii) of Regulation S-K. The audit committee’s duties will be to recommend to our Board of Directors the engagement of independent auditors to audit our financial statements and to review our accounting and auditing principles. The audit committee will review the scope, timing and fees for the annual audit and the results of audit examinations performed by the internal auditors and independent public accountants, including their recommendations to improve the system of accounting and internal controls. The audit committee will at all times be composed exclusively of directors who are, in the opinion of our Board of Directors, free from any relationship that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment as a committee member and who possess an understanding of financial statements and generally accepted accounting principles.

Compensation Committee. We intend to establish a compensation committee of the Board of Directors once we have satisfied the other initial listing standards for listing our common stock on NASDAQ or another national exchange. The compensation committee will review and approve our salary and benefits policies, including compensation of executive officers. The compensation committee will also administer our stock option plans and recommend and approve grants of stock options under such plans.

Nominating Committee. We intend to establish a nominating committee of the Board of Directors once we have satisfied the other initial listing standards for listing our common stock on NASDAQ or another national exchange. The nominating committee will consider and make recommendations on matters related to the practices, policies and procedures of the Board and take a leadership role in shaping our corporate governance. As part of its duties, the nominating committee would assess the size, structure and composition of the Board and its committees, and coordinate the evaluation of Board performance. The nominating committee would also act as a screening and nominating committee for candidates considered for election to the Board.

Board Leadership Structure and Role in Risk Oversight

Our Board of Directors is primarily responsible for overseeing our risk management processes on behalf of the Company. The Board of Directors receives and reviews periodic reports from management, auditors, legal counsel, and others, as considered appropriate regarding our Company’s assessment of risks. The Board of Directors focuses on the most significant risks facing our Company and our Company’s general risk management strategy, and also ensures that risks undertaken by our Company are consistent with the Board’s appetite for risk. While the Board oversees our Company’s risk management, management is responsible for day-to-day risk management processes. We believe this division of responsibilities is the most effective approach for addressing the risks facing our Company and that our Board leadership structure supports this approach.

Item 11. Executive Compensation

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Summary Compensation Table

The table below summarizes all compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to our former or current executive officers for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2017 and December 31, 3016.

Narrative Disclosure to the Summary Compensation Table

For the years ending December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, the Company has a one-year agreement for Ms. Carlise, as its Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary. The agreement is effective December 1, 2016 and has an automatic renewal clause whereby the agreement renews itself for another year, if not cancelled by the Company previously. The agreement has been automatically extended for an additional term of one year each. In addition to the base salary of $140,000 annually, Ms. Carlise shall be eligible to receive an annual cash bonus if the Company meets or exceeds criteria adopted by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors and shall be eligible for grants of awards under stock option or other equity incentive plans of the Company.

On March 3, 2016, the Company entered into a two-year Executive Employment Agreement with Mr. Phipps, effective January 1, 2016 (the “Employment Agreement”). Under the Employment Agreement, Mr. Phipps will serve as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and President and receive an annual base salary equal to the sum of $144,000 and £48,000, or $65,078 at the yearly conversion rate of 1.3558. Mr. Phipps is also eligible for bonus compensation in an amount equal to up to fifty (50%) percent of his then-current base salary if the Company meets or exceeds criteria adopted by the Compensation Committee, if any, or Board and equity awards as may be approved in the discretion of the Compensation Committee or Board. Also, on March 3, 2016 and effective January 1, 2016, the Corporation’s wholly owned subsidiary Orbital Satcom and Mr. Phipps, terminated an employment agreement between them dated February 19, 2015 pursuant to which Mr. Phipps was employed as President of Orbital Satcom for an annual base salary of $180,000. The other terms of this agreement with the Company are identical to the terms of Mr. Phipps’ employment agreement with Orbital Satcom described above.

On May 26, 2017, the Company issued 33,333 options to Mr. Phipps, 25,000 options to Theresa Carlise, 8,333 options to Hector Delgado, its Director and 133,333 options to certain employees of the Company. The employees are the adult children of our Chief Executive Officer. The options were issued outside of the Company’s 2014 Equity Incentive Plan and are not governed by the 2014 Plan. The options have an exercise price of $1.50 per share, vest immediately, and have a term of ten years. The options were valued on the grant date at approximately $3.00 per option or a total of $200,000 using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: stock price of $3.00 per share (based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock of the date of issuance post-split), volatility of 736%, expected term of 10 years, and a risk-free interest rate of 1.30%. In connection with the stock option grant, the Company recorded stock-based compensation for the year ended December 31, 2017 of $600,000, respectively.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

The table below summarizes all unexercised options, stock that has not vested, and equity incentive plan awards for each named executive officer as of December 31, 2017.

Director Compensation

The table below summarizes all compensation of our directors for our last completed fiscal year.

Narrative Disclosure to the Director Compensation Table

The Company pays David Phipps a monthly fee of $3,000 for his services as a director of the company, in addition to his compensation as Chief Executive Officer and President.

On December 29, 2016, the Board of Directors approved increasing its quarterly payments from $3,500 to $5,000, to its independent director, Hector Delgado.

On December 16, 2016, the Company issued options to Mr. Phipps, to purchase up to 66,667 shares of common stock. The options have an exercise price of $1.50 per share, vest immediately, and have a term of ten years. The options were valued on the grant date at approximately $3.00 per option. The amount is disclosed in the executive compensation table as well as, with the director compensation.

On May 26, 2017, the Company issued 8,333 options to Hector Delgado, its Director and 33,333 options to Mr. Phipps. The options were issued outside of the Company’s 2014 Equity Incentive Plan and are not governed by the 2014 Plan. The options have an exercise price of $1.50 per share, vest immediately, and have a term of ten years. The options were valued on the grant date at approximately $3.00 per option or a total of $200,000 using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: stock price of $3.00 per share (based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock of the date of issuance post-split), volatility of 736%, expected term of 10 years, and a risk-free interest rate of 1.30%. Additionally, on May 26, 2017, the Company issued another 133,000 options to certain employees of the Company. The options were issued outside of the Company’s 2014 Equity Incentive Plan and are not governed by the 2014 Plan. The options have an exercise price of $1.50 per share, vest immediately, and have a term of ten years. The options were valued on the grant date at approximately $3.00 per option. In connection with the stock option grant, as described above, the Company recorded stock-based compensation for the year ended December 31, 2017 of $600,000, respectively.

Mr. Phipps and Mr. Delgado receive no compensation from the Company except as described above.

Employment Agreements with Current Management

Other than as described above, there are no additional agreements with current management, for the two years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively,

Grants of Plan Based Awards and Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

1,511 shares, of our common stock are reserved for issuance under the 2014 Equity Incentive Plan as awards to employees, directors, consultants, advisors and other service providers. There are no outstanding equity awards as of December 31, 2017 as reserved under the 2014 Equity Incentive Plan.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

None of our executive officers serves as a member of the Board of Directors or compensation committee of any other entity that has one or more of its executive officers serving as a member of our Board of Directors.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

The following tables sets forth, as of March 30, 2018, the number of and percent of the Company’s common stock beneficially owned by: (1) all directors and nominees, naming them; (2) our executive officers; (3) our directors and executive officers as a group, without naming them; and (4) persons or groups known by us to own beneficially 5% or more of our voting securities.

A person is deemed to be the beneficial owner of securities that can be acquired by him within 60 days from March 30, 2018 upon the exercise of options, warrants or convertible securities. Each beneficial owner’s percentage ownership is determined by assuming that options, warrants or convertible securities that are held by him, but not those held by any other person, and which are exercisable within 60 days of March 30, 2018 have been exercised and converted.

AMOUNT AND NATURE OF BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP

(1) In determining the voting power held by a person or entity, the percentage of total voting power represents voting power with respect to all shares of our common stock and preferred stock, as a single class. The holders of our common stock are entitled to one vote per share, or 936,519 votes as of March 30, 2018 , holders of our Series B Preferred Stock are entitled to one vote per 1/150^th or 0.0333 a share, holders of our Series C Preferred Stock are entitled to one vote per 10/150^th or 0.0667 a share, holders of our Series D Preferred Stock are entitled to one vote per 20/150^th or 0.1333 a share, holders of our Series E Preferred Stock are entitled to one vote per 10/150^th or 0.0667 a share, holders of our Series F Preferred Stock are entitled to one vote per 1/150^th or 0.0067 a share, holders of our Series G Preferred Stock are entitled to one vote per 1/150^th or 0.0067 a share, holders of our Series H Preferred Stock are entitled to one vote per 100/150^th or 0.6667 a share, holders of our Series I Preferred Stock are entitled to one vote per 100/150^th or 0.6667 a share, holders of our Series J Preferred Stock are entitled to one vote per 1,000,/150^th or 6.6667 a share and holders of our Series K Preferred Stock are entitled to one vote per 100/150^th or 0.6667 a share.

In determining the percent of voting power by a person or entity, (a) the numerator is the number of common shares outstanding as of March 30, 2018, (936,519), and common shares available to acquire upon conversion, subject to 9.99% ownership limitations, whereby the owner would not exceed 9.99% of the outstanding shares of common stock (345,330) and (b) the denominator is the sum of (i) the total shares of common stock outstanding on March 30, 2018 (936,519) and (ii) conversion of preferred stock, (345,330), subject to ownership limitations on conversion and exercise as more fully described in the notes below, which is an aggregate of 1,281,849 shares Not included in calculating voting power are (i) shares of common stock which may be acquired within 60 days upon exercise of warrants or options and (ii) preferred shares of common stock which exceed the beneficial ownership limitations on the voting rights and conversion of convertible preferred shares.

(2) In determining the percent of common stock beneficially owned by a person or entity, (a) the numerator is the number of shares of the class beneficially owned by such person or entity, including shares which may be acquired within 60 days on exercise of warrants or options (285,667) and common shares available to acquire upon conversion, subject to 9.99% ownership limitations, whereby the owner would not exceed 9.99% of the outstanding shares of common stock (341,214) and (b) the denominator is the sum of (i) the total shares of common stock outstanding on March 30, 2018, (936,519) and (ii) the total number of shares that the beneficial owner may acquire upon exercise of options, (285,667) and (iii) conversion of preferred stock, (341,214), subject to ownership limitations on conversion and exercise as more fully described in the notes below, which is an aggregate of 1,563,400 shares.

(3) The holders of our Series B Preferred Stock are entitled to one vote for each 1/150^th or 0.0333 per share of Series B Preferred Stock owned at the record date for the determination of shareholders entitled to vote, or, if no record date is established, at the date such vote is taken, or any written consent of shareholders is solicited, as effectuated by the 1:150 reverse split on March 8, 2018.. Each share of Series B Preferred Stock is convertible into 5/150^th or 0.0333 a share of common stock. Pursuant to the terms of the Series B Preferred Stock, a holder cannot convert any of the Series B Preferred Stock if such holder would beneficially own, after any such conversion, more than 9.99% of the outstanding shares of common stock. However, this beneficial ownership limitation does not prevent the holders from selling some of their holdings and then converting additional shares of Series B Preferred Stock into common stock. In this way, the holders could sell more than these limits while never holding more than those limits.

(4) Each share of Series C Preferred Stock is convertible into 10/150^th or 0.0667 per share of common stock as effectuated by the 1:150 reverse split on March 8, 2018. Pursuant to the terms of the Series C Preferred Stock, a holder cannot convert any of the Series C Preferred Stock if such holder would beneficially own, after any such conversion, more than 9.99% of the outstanding shares of common stock. However, this beneficial ownership limitation does not prevent the holders from selling some of their holdings and then converting additional shares of Series C Preferred Stock into common stock. In this way, the holders could sell more than these limits while never holding more than those limits. Subject to the beneficial ownership limitation, each holder is entitled to one vote for each 10/150^th or 0.0667 per share of Series C Preferred Stock owned at the record date for the determination of shareholders entitled to vote, or, if no record date is established, at the date such vote is taken, or any written consent of shareholders is solicited.

(5) Each share of Series D Preferred Stock is convertible into 20/150^th or 0.1333 per share of common stock, as effectuated by the 1:150 reverse split on March 8, 2018. Pursuant to the terms of the Series D Preferred Stock, a holder cannot convert any of the Series D Preferred Stock if such holder would beneficially own, after any such conversion, more than 9.99% of the outstanding shares of common stock. However, this beneficial ownership limitation does not prevent the holders from selling some of their holdings and then converting additional shares of Series D Preferred Stock into common stock. In this way, the holders could sell more than these limits while never holding more than those limits. Subject to the beneficial ownership limitation, each holder is entitled to one vote for each 20/150^th or 0.1333 per share of Series D Preferred Stock owned at the record date for the determination of shareholders entitled to vote, or, if no record date is established, at the date such vote is taken, or any written consent of shareholders is solicited.

(6) Each share of Series E Preferred Stock is convertible into 10/150^th or 0.0667 per share of common stock as effectuated by the 1:150 reverse split on March 8, 2018. Pursuant to the terms of the Series E Preferred Stock, a holder cannot convert any of the Series E Preferred Stock if such holder would beneficially own, after any such conversion, more than 9.99% of the outstanding shares of common stock. However, this beneficial ownership limitation does not prevent the holders from selling some of their holdings and then converting additional shares of Series E Preferred Stock into common stock. In this way, the holders could sell more than these limits while never holding more than those limits. Subject to the beneficial ownership limitation, each holder is entitled to one vote for each 10/150^th or 0.0667 per share of Series E Preferred Stock owned at the record date for the determination of shareholders entitled to vote, or, if no record date is established, at the date such vote is taken, or any written consent of shareholders is solicited

(7) Each share of Series F Preferred Stock is convertible into 1/150^th or 0.0067 per share of common stock as effectuated by the 1:150 reverse split on March 8, 2018. Pursuant to the terms of the Series F Preferred Stock, a holder cannot convert any of the Series F Preferred Stock if such holder would beneficially own, after any such conversion, more than 9.99% of the outstanding shares of common stock. However, this beneficial ownership limitation does not prevent the holders from selling some of their holdings and then converting additional shares of Series F Preferred Stock into common stock. In this way, the holders could sell more than these limits while never holding more than those limits. Subject to the beneficial ownership limitation, each holder is entitled to one vote for each 1/150^th or 0.0067 per share of Series F Preferred Stock owned at the record date for the determination of shareholders entitled to vote, or, if no record, date is established, at the date, such vote is taken, or any written consent of shareholders is solicited.

(8) Each share of Series G Preferred Stock is convertible into 1/150^th or 0.0067 per share of common stock as effectuated by the 1:150 reverse split on March 8, 2018. Pursuant to the terms of the Series G Preferred Stock, a holder cannot convert any of the Series G Preferred Stock if such holder would beneficially own, after any such conversion, more than 9.99% of the outstanding shares of common stock. However, this beneficial ownership limitation does not prevent the holders from selling some of their holdings and then converting additional shares of Series G Preferred Stock into common stock. In this way, the holders could sell more than these limits while never holding more than those limits. Subject to the beneficial ownership limitation, each holder is entitled to one vote for each 1/150^th or 0.0067 per share of Series G Preferred Stock owned at the record date for the determination of shareholders entitled to vote, or, if no record, date is established, at the date, such vote is taken, or any written consent of shareholders is solicited.

(9) Each share of Series H Preferred Stock is convertible into 100/150^th or 0.6667 per share of common stock as effectuated by the 1:150 reverse split on March 8, 2018. Pursuant to the terms of the Series H Preferred Stock, a holder cannot convert any of the Series H Preferred Stock if such holder would beneficially own, after any such conversion, more than 9.99% of the outstanding shares of common stock. However, this beneficial ownership limitation does not prevent the holders from selling some of their holdings and then converting additional shares of Series H Preferred Stock into common stock. In this way, the holders could sell more than these limits while never holding more than those limits. Subject to the beneficial ownership limitation, each holder is entitled to one vote for each 100/150^th or 0.6667 per share of Series H Preferred Stock owned at the record date for the determination of shareholders entitled to vote, or, if no record, date is established, at the date, such vote is taken, or any written consent of shareholders is solicited.

(10) Each share of Series I Preferred Stock is convertible into 100/150^th or 0.6667 per share of common stock as effectuated by the 1:150 reverse split on March 8, 2018. Pursuant to the terms of the Series I Preferred Stock, a holder cannot convert any of the Series I Preferred Stock if such holder would beneficially own, after any such conversion, more than 9.99% of the outstanding shares of common stock. However, this beneficial ownership limitation does not prevent the holders from selling some of their holdings and then converting additional shares of Series I Preferred Stock into common stock. In this way, the holders could sell more than these limits while never holding more than those limits. Subject to the beneficial ownership limitation, each holder is entitled to one vote for each 100/150^th or 0.6667 per share of Series I Preferred Stock owned at the record date for the determination of shareholders entitled to vote, or, if no record, date is established, at the date, such vote is taken, or any written consent of shareholders is solicited.

(11) Each share of Series J Preferred Stock is convertible into 1000/150^th or 6.6667 per share of common stock as effectuated by the 1:150 reverse split on March 8, 2018. Pursuant to the terms of the Series J Preferred Stock, a holder cannot convert any of the Series J Preferred Stock if such holder would beneficially own, after any such conversion, more than 9.99% of the outstanding shares of common stock. However, this beneficial ownership limitation does not prevent the holders from selling some of their holdings and then converting additional shares of Series J Preferred Stock into common stock. In this way, the holders could sell more than these limits while never holding more than those limits. Subject to the beneficial ownership limitation, each holder is entitled to one vote for each 1000/150^th or 6.6667 per share of Series J Preferred Stock owned at the record date for the determination of shareholders entitled to vote, or, if no record, date is established, at the date, such vote is taken, or any written consent of shareholders is solicited.

(12) Each share of Series K Preferred Stock is convertible into 100/150^th or 0.6667 per share of common stock as effectuated by the 1:150 reverse split on March 8, 2018. Pursuant to the terms of the Series K Preferred Stock, a holder cannot convert any of the Series K Preferred Stock if such holder would beneficially own, after any such conversion, more than 9.99% of the outstanding shares of common stock. However, this beneficial ownership limitation does not prevent the holders from selling some of their holdings and then converting additional shares of Series K Preferred Stock into common stock. In this way, the holders could sell more than these limits while never holding more than those limits. Subject to the beneficial ownership limitation, each holder is entitled to one vote for each 100/150^th or 0.6667 per share of Series K Preferred Stock owned at the record date for the determination of shareholders entitled to vote, or, if no record, date is established, at the date, such vote is taken, or any written consent of shareholders is solicited.

(13) Unless otherwise indicated in the footnotes, the address of the beneficial owners is c/o Orbital Tracking Corp., 18851 N.E. 29th Ave., Suite 700, Aventura, Florida 33180.

(14) Includes (i) one vote for each 89,443 shares of common stock and (ii) 4,115 votes or 10/150^th or 0.0667 votes per share, of 4,115 shares of common stock, issuable upon conversion of 61,729 shares of Series E Preferred Stock. Does not include 338,575 votes and common shares issuable upon the conversion of 5,078,631 shares of Series E Preferred Stock due to the beneficial ownership limitations on the voting rights and conversion of the Series E Preferred Stock.

(15) Includes (i) one vote for each 89,443 shares of common stock and (ii) 100,000 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of options. Does not include 342,691 votes and 342,691 shares of common stock issuable upon the conversion of 5,140,360 shares of Series E Preferred Stock due to the beneficial ownership limitations on the voting rights and conversion of the Series E Preferred Stock.

(16) Includes 9,667 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of options.

(17) Includes 28,333 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of options.

(18) The address of this beneficial owner is 4400 Biscayne Blvd., #850, Miami Florida 33137.

(19) Includes (i) one vote per share for 21,584 shares of common stock held in the name of Michael Brauser and one vote per share for 25,019 shares of common stock held in the name of Grander Holdings Inc. 401K, (ii) one vote per share of 46,955 shares of common stock, issuable upon conversion of 352,164 shares of Series D Preferred Stock, held in the name of Michael Brauser. One share of Series D Preferred Stock is convertible into 20/150^th or 0.1333 of common. Does not include (i) 156,054 votes, or 20/150^th or 0.1333 votes per share of 1,170,402 shares of Series D Preferred Stock, due to the beneficial ownership limitations on the voting rights of the Series D Preferred Stock, held in the name of Michael Brauser and (ii) 7,184 votes or 1/150^th or 0.0067 votes per share of 7,184 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of 1,077,594 shares of Series G Preferred stock, due to the beneficial ownership limitations on the voting rights of the Series G Preferred Stock, held by Grander Holdings Inc. 401K., Mr. Brauser is the trustee of Grander Holdings Inc., 401K and holds voting and dispositive power over the securities of the Company held by Grander Holdings Inc., 401K and (iii) 112 votes or 100/150^th or 0.6667 votes per share of 112 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of 168 shares Series H Preferred Stock due to the beneficial ownership limitations on the voting rights and conversion of the Series H Preferred Stock held by Grander Holdings Inc. 401K., and (iv) 16,203 votes or 100/150^th or 0.6667 votes per share of 16,203 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of 24,305 shares Series I Preferred Stock due to the beneficial ownership limitations on the voting rights and conversion of the Series I Preferred Stock held by Grander Holdings Inc. 401K, (v) 33,333 votes or 1,000/150^th or 6.6667 votes per share of 33,333 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of 5,000 shares of Series J Preferred Stock due to the beneficial ownership limitations on the voting rights and conversion of the Series J Preferred Stock, held in the name of Grander Holdings Inc., 401k, (vi) 136,805 votes, or 100/150^th or 0.6667 votes per share, of 136,805 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of 205,208 shares of Series K Preferred Stock due to the beneficial ownership limitations on the voting rights and conversion of the Series K Preferred Stock, held in the name of Grander Holdings Inc., 401k, and (vii ) 91,074 votes, or 100/150^th or 0.6667 votes per share of 91,074 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of 136,611 shares of Series K Preferred Stock, due to the beneficial ownership limitations on the voting rights and conversion of the Series K Preferred Stock.

(20) The address of this beneficial owner is 4400 Biscayne Blvd., 15^th Fl. Miami Florida 33137

(21) Includes (i) one vote per share of 4,712 shares of common stock held by Phillip and Patricia Frost Philanthropic Frost Gamma Trust, (ii) one vote per share of 63,426 shares of common stock held by Frost Gamma Investments Trust, (iii) 134 shares of common stock held by Dr. Philip Frost and (iv) 25,286 votes or 10/150^th or 0.0667 votes per share, of 25,158 shares of common stock, issuable upon conversion of 379,294 shares of Series C Preferred Stock, held in the name of Frost Gamma Investments Trust. Dr. Frost is the trustee of Frost Gamma Investments Trust and Phillip and Patricia Frost Philanthropic and holds voting and dispositive power over the securities of the Company held by both. Does not include: (i) 98,240 votes, or 10/150^th or 0.0667 votes per share of 98,240 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of 1,473,600 shares of Series C Preferred Stock, due to the beneficial ownership limitations on the voting rights and conversion of the Series C Preferred Stock held by Frost Gamma Investments Trust and (ii) 715 votes or 100/150^th or 0.6667 votes per share of 715 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of 1,073 shares Series H Preferred Stock due to the beneficial ownership limitations on the voting rights and conversion of the Series H Preferred Stock held in the name of Frost Gamma Investments Trust, (iii) 200,000 votes or 1,000/150^th or 6.6667 votes per share of 200,000 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of 30,000 shares of Series J Preferred Stock due to the beneficial ownership limitations on the voting rights and conversion of the Series J Preferred Stock, held in the name of Frost Gamma Investments Trust and (iv) 125,000 votes, or 100/150^th or 0.6667 votes per share of 125,000 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of 187,500 shares of Series K Preferred Stock, due to the beneficial ownership limitations on the voting rights and conversion of the Series K Preferred Stock held by Frost Gamma Investments Trust.

(22) The address of this beneficial owner is 555 South Federal Highway #450, Boca Raton, Florida 33432

(23) Includes (i) one vote per share for 210 shares of common stock held by Barry Honig, (ii) one vote per share for 10,984 shares of common stock held by GRQ Consultants, Inc.,401K, (iii) one vote per share for 14 shares of common stock held by GRQ Consultants, Inc., and (iv) 82,350 votes, or 20/150^th or 0.1333 votes per share, of 82,350 shares of common stock, issuable upon conversion of 617,627 shares of Series D Preferred Stock, held in the name of GRQ Consultants, Inc.,401K. Mr. Honig is the trustee of GRQ Consultants, Inc. 401K, and holds voting and dispositive power over the securities of the Company held by GRQ Consultants, Inc. 401K. Mr. Honig is the president of GRQ Consultants, Inc. and holds voting and dispositive power over the securities of the company held by GRQ Consultants, Inc. Does not include (i) 9,796 votes, or 20/150^th or 0.1333 votes per share of 9,796 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of 73,467 shares of Series D Preferred Stock, due to the beneficial ownership limitations on the voting rights of the Series D Preferred Stock, held in the name of GRQ Consultants, Inc.,401K and (ii) 2,333 votes or 1/150^th or 0.0067 votes per share of 2,333 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of 349,999 shares of Series F Preferred Stock, due to the beneficial ownership limitations on the voting rights of the Series F Preferred Stock, held GRQ Consultants, Inc.,401K, (iii) 27,500 votes or 1/150^th or 0.0067 votes per share of 27,500 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of 4,125,008 shares of Series G Preferred Stock, due to the beneficial ownership limitations on the voting rights of the Series G Preferred Stock, held by GRQ Consultants, Inc.,401K, (iv) 8,333 votes or 100/150^th or 0.6667 votes per share of 8,333 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of 12,500 shares Series H Preferred Stock due to the beneficial ownership limitations on the voting rights and conversion of the Series H Preferred Stock held by GRQ Consultants, Inc.,401K, (v) 16,203 votes or 100/150^th or 0.6667 votes per share of 16,203 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of 24,305 shares Series I Preferred Stock, due to the beneficial ownership limitations on the voting rights and conversion of the Series I Preferred Stock held by GRQ Consultants, Inc.,401K, (vi) 33,333 votes or 1,000/150^th or 6.6667 votes per share of 33,333 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of 5,000 shares of Series J Preferred Stock due to the beneficial ownership limitations on the voting rights and conversion of the Series J Preferred Stock, held in the name of GRQ Consultants, Inc.,401K, (vii) 227,880 votes, or 100/150^th or 0.6667 votes per share, of 227,880 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of 341,820 shares of Series K Preferred Stock due to the beneficial ownership limitations on the voting rights and conversion of the Series K Preferred Stock, held in the name of GRQ Consultants, Inc.,401K and (viii) 111 votes or 1/150^th or 0.0333 of 111 shares of common stock issuable upon the conversion of 3,333 shares of Series B Preferred Stock due to beneficial ownership limitations on voting rights held in the name of Barry Honig.

(24) The address of this beneficial owner is 2828 Routh Street, Suite 500, Dallas, Texas 75201.

(25) Includes (i) one vote per share of 667 shares of common stock held in the name of Sandor Master Capital Fund, (ii) one vote per share of 8,334 shares of common stock held in the name JSL Kids Partners, of which Mr. Lemak is the control person, (iii) 4,052 votes or 10/150^th or 0.0667 votes per share, of 4,052 shares of common stock, issuable upon conversion of 60,782 shares of Series C Preferred Stock, held in the name of Sandor Capital Master Fund LP, (iv) 80,505 votes or 10/150^th or 0.1333 votes per share, of 80,505 shares of common stock, issuable upon conversion of 603,789 shares of Series D Preferred Stock, held in the name of Sandor Capital Master Fund LP. John Lemak is the manager of Sandor Capital Master Fund LP and holds voting and dispositive power over the securities of the Company held by Sandor Capital Master Fund LP. Does not include: (i) 6,828 votes, or 20/150^th or 0.1333 votes per share of 51,211 shares of Series D Preferred Stock, due to the beneficial ownership limitations on the voting rights of the Series D Preferred Stock, held in the name or Sandor Capital Master Fund, and (ii) 50,000 votes, or 100/150^th or 0.6667 votes per share, of 50,000 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of 75,000 shares of Series K Preferred Stock due to the beneficial ownership limitations on the voting rights and conversion of the Series K Preferred Stock held by Sandor Capital Master Fund LP.

(26) The address of this beneficial owner is 61 Broadway FL 32, New York, NY 10006-2701.

(27) Includes (i) one vote per share of 40,094 shares of common stock held by Sichenzia Ross Ference Kesner LLP, (ii) one vote per share of 9,830 shares of common stock held by Paradox Capital Partners LLC, (iii) one vote per share of 10 shares of common stock held by Aurcana LLC, (iv) 595 votes or 1,000/150^th or 6.6667 votes per share of 595 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of 3,967 shares of Series J Preferred Stock due to the beneficial ownership limitations on the voting rights and conversion of the Series J Preferred Stock, held in the name of Sichenzia Ross Ference Kesner LLP, (vii) 39,667 votes, or 100/150^th or 0.6667 votes per share, of 39,667 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of 59,501 shares of Series K Preferred Stock due to the beneficial ownership limitations on the voting rights and conversion of the Series K Preferred Stock, held in the name of Paradox Capital Partners LLC. Does not include (i) 4,984 votes, or 100/150^th or 0.6667 votes per share, of 4,984 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of 7,476 shares of Series K Preferred Stock due to the beneficial ownership limitations on the voting rights and conversion of the Series K Preferred Stock, held in the name of Paradox Capital Partners LLC. Harvey Kesner partner of Sichenzia Ross Ference Kesner LLP has voting control and investment discretion over the securities reported herein that are held by Sichenzia Ross Ference Kesner LLP. Mr. Kesner principal of Paradox Capital Partners LLC and Aurcana LLC has voting control and investment discretion over the securities reported herein that are held by same.

(28) The address of this beneficial owner is 68 Fiesta Way, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301.

(29) Includes (i) one vote per share of one share of common stock held by John Stetson and (ii) one vote per share of 40,842 shares of common stock held by Oban Investments LLC, (iii) 27,353 votes or 1,000/150^th or 6.6667 votes per share of 27,353 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of 4,103 shares of Series J Preferred Stock due to the beneficial ownership limitations on the voting rights and conversion of the Series J Preferred Stock, held in the name of Oban Investments LLC and (iv) 25,362 votes, or 100/150^th or 0.6667 votes per share, of 25,362 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of 38,043 shares of Series K Preferred Stock due to the beneficial ownership limitations on the voting rights and conversion of the Series K Preferred Stock, held in the name of Oban Investments LLC. Does not include (i) 70,471 votes, or 100/150^th or 0.6667 votes per share, of 70,471 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of 105,707 shares of Series K Preferred Stock, due to the beneficial ownership limitations on the voting rights and conversion of the Series K Preferred Stock, held in the name of Oban Investments LLC. John Stetson is the manager of Oban Investments LLC and holds voting and dispositive power over the securities of the Company held by Oban Investments LLC.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.

The Company

SEC rules require us to disclose any transaction or currently proposed transaction in which the Company is a participant and in which any related person has or will have a direct or indirect material interest involving the lesser of $120,000 or one percent (1%) of the average of the Company’s total assets as of the end of last two completed fiscal years. A related person is any executive officer, director, nominee for director, or holder of 5% or more of the Company’s common stock, or an immediate family member of any of those persons.

For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, Orbital Satcom purchased an aggregate of approximately $881,151 and $499,245 of inventory from GTCL. For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, GTCL purchased an aggregate of approximately $5,774 and $38,578 of inventory from Orbital Satcom.

On March 3, 2016, the Company entered into a two-year Executive Employment Agreement with Mr. Phipps, effective January 1, 2016 (The “Employment Agreement”). Under the Employment Agreement, Mr. Phipps will serve as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and President and receive an annual base salary equal to the sum of $144,000 and £48,000, or $65,078 at the yearly conversion rate of 1.3558. Mr. Phipps is also eligible for bonus compensation in an amount equal to up to fifty (50%) percent of his then-current base salary if the Company meets or exceeds criteria adopted by the Compensation Committee, if any, or Board and equity awards as may be approved in the discretion of the Compensation Committee or Board. Also, on March 3, 2016 and effective January 1, 2016, the Corporation’s wholly owned subsidiary Orbital Satcom Corp. and Mr. Phipps, terminated an employment agreement between them dated February 19, 2015 pursuant to which Mr. Phipps was employed as President of Orbital Satcom for an annual base salary of $180,000. The other terms of this agreement with the Company are identical to the terms of Mr. Phipps’ employment agreement with Orbital Satcom described above.

On May 17, 2016, the Company entered into exchange agreements with holders of the Company’s outstanding $504,168 of Notes pursuant to which the Notes were cancelled, and the exchanging holders were issued an aggregate of 10,083,351 shares of newly designated Series G Preferred Stock. The terms of the shares of Series G Preferred Stock (the “Preferred G Shares”) are set forth in the Certificate of Designation of Series G Preferred Stock (the “Series G COD”) filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Nevada. The Series G COD authorizes 10,090,000 Preferred G Shares. The Preferred G Shares are convertible into 1/150^th or 0.0067 shares of common stock, each subject to adjustment for stock splits, stock dividends, recapitalizations, combinations, subdivisions or other similar events. The Company is prohibited from effecting a conversion of the Preferred G Shares to the extent that, as a result of such conversion, such investor would beneficially own more than 4.99% of the number of shares of common stock outstanding immediately after giving effect to the issuance of shares of Common Stock upon conversion of the Preferred G Shares. Each Preferred G Share entitles the holder to vote on all matters voted on by holders of common stock as a single class. With respect to any such vote, each Preferred G Share entitles the holder to cast 1/150^th or 0.0067 vote per share of Series G Preferred Stock owned at the time of such vote subject to the 4.99% beneficial ownership limitation. On December 5, 2017, pursuant to the approval of our board of directors and a majority of the shareholders in each class, we increased the maximum conversion limit from 4.99% to 9.99%. Prior to December 28, 2016, subject to certain specified exceptions, in the event the Company issues securities at a per share price less than the conversion price, each holder will be entitled to receive from the Company additional shares of common stock such that the holder shall hold that number of conversion shares, in total, had such holder purchased the Preferred G Shares with a conversion price equal to the lower price issuance.

On October 28, 2016, the Company entered into separate subscription agreements with Barry Honig, Michael Brauser and Frost Gamma Investments Trust relating to the issuance and sale of $350,000, out of a maximum of $800,000, of shares of Series H Preferred Stock at a purchase price of $4.00 per share (the “Series H Offering”). The terms of the Series H Preferred Stock are set forth in the Certificate of Designation of Series H Preferred Stock (the “Series H COD”) filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Nevada. The Series H Preferred Stock are convertible into to 1/150^th or 0.0067, shares of common stock. The Company is prohibited from effecting a conversion of the Series H Preferred Stock to the extent that, as a result of such conversion, the investor would beneficially own more than 4.99% of the number of shares of the Company’s common stock outstanding immediately after giving effect to the issuance of shares of common stock upon conversion of the Series H Preferred Stock. Each Series H Preferred Stock entitles the holder to cast 100/150^th or 0.6667 vote per share of Series H Preferred Stock owned as of the record date for the determination of shareholders entitled to vote, subject to the 4.99% beneficial ownership limitation. On December 5, 2017, pursuant to the approval of our board of directors and a majority of the shareholders in each class, we increased the maximum conversion limit from 4.99% to 9.99%. In order to conduct the Series H Offering, the Company has solicited the consent of certain shareholders, as required under the agreements entered into by the Company during prior offerings, whereby such shareholders were granted certain notification, consent and anti-dilution rights (“Prior Offerings”). Certain shareholders have waived their right to adjustment, equal treatment, most favored nations and other rights to which they were entitled pursuant to the Prior Offerings, including without limitation, certain rights granted to holders of our Series C Preferred Stock, Series F Preferred Stock and G Preferred Stock. However, the Company is required to issue to certain prior investors an aggregate of 550,000 shares of Series C Preferred Stock, which is convertible into an aggregate of 36,667 shares of the Company’s common stock. These investors are: Frost Gamma Investments Trust, ADH Capital Ventures LLC and JSL Kids Partners LLC, an affiliate of Sandor Capital Master Fund LP. Further, in order to proceed with the Series H Offering, the Company had agreed to issue additional shares of Series F Preferred Stock and Series G Preferred Stock to Intracoastal Capital LLC and Sandor Capital Master Fund LP. However, in lieu of issuing such additional shares of Series F Preferred Stock and Series G Preferred Stock, the Company agreed, pursuant to that certain Series I Issuance Agreement, to create a new series of preferred stock, to be designated as “Series I Preferred Stock” and will issue to such holders of Series F Preferred Stock and Series G Preferred Stock an aggregate of 114,944 shares of Series I Preferred Stock, each of which shall be convertible 100/150^th or 0.6667 shares of the Company’s common stock. Intracoastal Capital LLC was issued 91,944 shares of Series I and Sandor Master Capital Fund LP was issued 23,000 shares of Series I Preferred Stock. The terms of the Series I Preferred Stock are set forth in the Certificate of Designation of Series I Preferred Stock filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Nevada.

On December 16, 2016, the Company issued options to Mr. Phipps, to purchase up to 66,667 shares of common stock. The options were issued outside of the Company’s 2014 Equity Incentive Plan and are not governed by the Plan. The options have an exercise price of $1.50 per share, vest immediately, and have a term of ten years.

On May 26, 2017, the Company issued 33,333 options to Mr. Phipps, 25,000 options to Theresa Carlise, 8,333 options to Hector Delgado, its Director and 133,333 options to certain employees of the Company. The employees are the adult children of our Chief Executive Officer. The options were issued outside of the Company’s 2014 Equity Incentive Plan and are not governed by the 2014 Plan. The options have an exercise price of $1.50 per share, vest immediately, and have a term of ten years. The 200,000 options were valued on the grant date at approximately $3.00 per option or a total of $600,000 using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: stock price of $3.00 per share (based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock of the date of issuance, volatility of 736%, expected term of 10 years, and a risk-free interest rate of 1.30%. In connection with the stock option grant, the Company recorded stock-based compensation for the year ended December 31, 2017 of $600,000, respectively.

Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services

During the fiscal years ending December 31, 2017 and 2016, RBSM LLP was the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm.

The following table sets forth fees billed to us by our independent registered public accounting firms during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016.